A Retrospective Evaluation of Femicide Cases Between the Years 2012-2022 in Denizli
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Research
VOLUME: 29 ISSUE: 1
P: 69 - 73
April 2024

A Retrospective Evaluation of Femicide Cases Between the Years 2012-2022 in Denizli

The Bulletin of Legal Medicine 2024;29(1):69-73
1. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Denizli, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 15.09.2023
Accepted Date: 28.10.2023
Publish Date: 01.04.2024
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Femicide is the most extreme point of violence against women. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the sociodemographic characteristics of femicide cases in Denizli and to present solutions by discussing in the light of literature information.

Methods:

In this study, crime scene investigation reports and autopsy reports of femicide cases in Denizli between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The cases were evaluated in terms of age, marital status, education level, perpetrator of violence, murder method, crime scene, and cause of death parameters.

Results:

It was determined that there were 41 femicide cases in Denizli between 2012 and 2022. In the majority of cases, the perpetrator was a intimate partner. The homicide took place mostly in the woman’s home, and the most common method of killing was firearms.

Conclusion:

Policies to prevent violence against women, expanding access to post-violence services, and strengthening laws, policies and action plans to end violence can be effective in reducing femicide.

Keywords:
Femicide, intimate partner violence, domestic violence, autopsy

References

1
Özkan G. Kadına Yönelik Şiddet- Aile İçi Şiddet ve Konuya İlişkin Uluslararası Metinler Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Hacettepe HFD. 2017;7(1):533-564. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/744941
2
Yilmaz E, Kumral B, Canturk N, Erkol Z, Okumus AM. Analysis and comparison of domestic femicide cases in the cities of Diyarbakir & Tekirdag, Turkey: A preliminary study. J Forensic Leg Med. 2015;34:17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.04.018
3
Toprak S, Ersoy G. Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182409. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182409
4
Gazioğlu E. Kadın Cinayetleri: Kavramsallaştırma ve Sorunlu Yaklaşımlar. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları. 2013;7(30):89-100. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.56071
5
Understanding and addressing violence against women. Femicide. Erişim Tarihi: 25.07.2023 https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/77421/WHO_RHR_12.38_eng.pdf
6
Gender-related killings of women and girls (femicide/feminicide) Erişim Tarihi: 25.07.2023 https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2022-11/Gender-related-killings-of-women-and-girls-improving-data-to-improve-responses-to-femicide-feminicide-en.pdf
7
Stöckl H, Devries K, Rotstein A, Abrahams N, Campbell J, Watts C, Moreno CG. The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet. 2013;382(9895):859-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2
8
Cooper A, Smith E. Homicide trends in the United States, 1980-2008, BJS Statisticians, Washington, DC (2011).
9
Çilingiroğlu N, Erbaydar NP. 390 Intimate partner violence: Turkey’s femicide problem. Injury Prevention 2016;22:A143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042156.390
10
Yegen C. İnternet haberciliğinde kadın cinayeti haberlerinin sunumu: Posta gazetesi örneği. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication. 2014;4(3):15-28. http://www.tojdac.org/tojdac/VOLUME4-ISSUE3_files/tojdac_v04i302.pdf
11
Erden G, Akdur S. Türkiye’de kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet ve kadın cinayetleri. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi. 2018;2(3):128-139. https://doi.org/10.31828/kpd2602443808092018m000003
12
Çalışkan M. İstanbul’da “Kadına Şiddet” Ve “Kadın Cinayeti” Vakalarına Yönelik, Nicel-Nitel Bir İnceleme. BAİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2019;19(1):221-241. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.vi.513032
13
Tütüncüler A, Ozer E, Karagöz YM, Beyaztaş FY. Evalution of femicide cases committed between the years 1996-2005 in Antalya. Omega (Westport). 2015;71(2):198-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222815570600
14
Biehler-Gomez L, Maggioni L, Tambuzzi S, Kustermann A, Cattaneo C. Twenty years of femicide in Milan: A retrospective medicolegal analysis. Sci Justice. 2022;62(2):214-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.02.007
15
Sorrentino A, Guida C, Cinquegrana V, Baldry AC. Femicide Fatal Risk Factors: A last decade comparison between Italian victims of femicide by age groups. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7953. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217953
16
Salameh HOG, Salameh RJ, Shwaiki M, Abder-Rahman H. Forensic medical aspects of femicide in Jordan. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;56:90-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.03.015
17
Langford L, Isaac NE, Kabat S. Homicides related to intimate partner violence in Massachusetts. Homicide Stud. 1998;2:353-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767998002004002
18
Campbell JC, Webster D, Koziol-McLain J, Block C, Campbell D, Curry MA, et al. Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(7):1089-1097. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.7.1089
19
Karbeyaz K, Akkaya H, Balci Y. An analysis of the murder of women in a 10-year period in Eskişehir Province located in western Anatolia in Turkey. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(6):736-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.04.007
20
Vignali G, Franceschetti L, Merzagora I. A retrospective study on femicides assessed at the Institute of Legal Medicine of Milan. Are older women at risk? Forensic Sci Int. 2021;325:110890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110890
21
Fong WL, Pan CH, Lee JC, Lee TT, Hwa HL. Adult femicide victims in forensic autopsy in Taiwan: A 10-year retrospective study. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.008
22
Balcı Y, Ekinci E, Anolay NN, Çallak F. Bir otopsi merkezinden kadın cinayeti-intihar olguları: İkili ölüm serisi. The Bulletin of Legal Medicine. 2023;28(2):187-193. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1614