Determination of Consistency and Reliability of Diagnostic Accuracy Derived From Autopsy Photographs

Authors

  • Çiğdem Süner Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı
  • Can Gökdoğan İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı
  • Bülent Şam Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı Morg İhtisas Dairesi
  • Sadık Toprak Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı
  • Mustafa Pac Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.200273481

Keywords:

forensic photography, autopsy, firearm injuries

Abstract

Forensic photography plays a significant role in investigation and recording in criminological procedures. Photographs are used as a document in many instances and sometimes becomes a part of an investigation method. Photographs taken at the scene, during the autopsy or examination, might be inspected again for education purposes or in order to revise the details and obtain consultation from other specialists. In this study, determination of the consistency and reliability of diagnosis derived from the photographs taken from firearm injuries during the autopsies is aimed. The cases were chosen randomly among the firearm injury cases, in the Morgue Specialization Department in the Institute of Forensic Medicine, Ministery of Justice, between October 2001 and April 2002. Forensic medicine specialists evaluated lesions of 18 cases at the autopsy and photographs were taken with a 35 mm camera using dia-positive films. The photographs evaluated independently by four forensic specialists twice in a month interval. In order to evaluate the reliability of diagnosis from photographs, the ‘gold standard’ findings which had been defined in the autopsy were compared with the findings of photograph examination. Self-consistency of each reviewer was estimated with kappa test. The study was designed in double-blind. The significance value was accepted as p < 0,03. The kappa median values of the four evaluators were found to be between 62,0 and 86,0. In the first evaluation, one of the reviewers had the highest mean accuracy rate 88 + 0.03, whereas the lowest rate was 78 + 0.03. In the second evaluation, the highest mean accuracy rate was 86 + 0.03 while the lowest was 79 + 0.03. When both evaluations taken in consideration for all the cases, a significant difference in diagnostic accuracies of the reviewers was not noticed (p > 0.05).

Keywords: Forensic photography, autopsy, firearm injuries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Redsicker DR, Gordner G, James SH, Laws AC. The Practical Methodology of Forensic Photography. New York, 1994;1-176.

Forest PR, Gaensslen RE, Lee HC. Forensic Science An Introduction to Criminalistics. Me Graw-Hill, Inc. USA, 1983;426-449.

Kalfagil S. Fotoğraf Teorisi Ders Notları 1. İFSAK, İstanbul: 1998; 2-8.

Ergin E. Her Yönüyle Fotoğrafçılık Tekniği, inkılap ve Aka Kitapevi, İstanbul, 1982; 25-30.

Hedgecoe J. Her Yönüyle Fotoğraf Sanatı. 2. Baskı. Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul, 1996; 26-27.

Carper KL. Forensic Engineering. 2nd ed. CRC Press LLC, USA, 2001: 327-359.

Clement JG, Ranson DL. Craniofacial Identification in Forensic Medicine. Oxford Universty Press, New York, 1998;105-162.

Patrick E, Matthews B, Smock WS. Forensic Photography in the Emergency Department. Olshaker JS, Jackson MC, Smock WS. ed. Forensic Emergency Medicine. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, USA, 2001: 257-283.

Geberth VJ. Practical Homicide Investigation. 3th ed. CRC Press, USA, 1996: 127-236.

Ricci LR. Child Abuse Medical Diagnosis and Management. 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, USA, 2001: 385-404.

Bevel T, Gardner RM. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis with An Introduction to Crime Scene Reconstruction. CRC Press, USA, 1997: 205-229.

Eckert WG. Introduction to Forensic Sciences. 2nd ed. CRC Press, USA, 1997: 328-330.

Noon R. Introduction to Forensic Enginering. 2nd ed. CRC Press, USA, 1992: 57-62.

Bilge S, Taşkıranoğlu-Tırtıl L. Cinsel istismara maruz kalan çocuklar: mağdur, saldırgan özellikleri ve ruhsal / davranışsal bozukluklar. Klinik Adli Tıp Dergisi, 2001; 1 (l):l-8.

Muram D. Arheart KL, Jennings SG. Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopic photographs in child sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 1999; 12 (2): 58-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083-3188(00)86627-9

Adams JA, Wells R. Normal versus abnormal genital findindings in children: Flow well do examiners agree? Child Abuse Negl 1993; 17:663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(93)90087-L

Downloads

Published

2002-12-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Süner Çiğdem, Gökdoğan C, Şam B, Toprak S, Pac M. Determination of Consistency and Reliability of Diagnostic Accuracy Derived From Autopsy Photographs. Bull Leg Med. 2002;7(3):85-91. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.200273481