Measurement of Pen Pressure of Offline Signatures Using 3D Digital Microscopy and Its Utility in Determining Authorship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1704Keywords:
3D Digital Microscope, Genuine signature, Simulation, Pen pressure, None practiced free-hand, Practiced free-handAbstract
Objective: Two of the most frequently used diagnostic criteria in writing and signature comparisons are the degree of pen pressure and variations in pen pressure. However, in today’s practice, this criterion is inferentially evaluated only by naked eye or using image enhancer tools. This situation may cause various results among examiners, and difficulties in judicial procedure in terms of forensic handwriting and signature examinations, which has already been criticized for subjectivity. In this study, it is aimed to measure the depth of the indented pen pressure numerically in offline signatures and to evaluate it more objectively compared to the classical methods.
Methods: Note that 10 male and 10 female subjects participated in this study. Subjects were asked to imitate the signature shown as an example on three different surfaces. This signature was imitated by the subjects three times on different surfaces via free-hand (practise and non practice). Depth measurements were taken from five different points on the signature using a Leica DVM-6 3D Digital Microscope and compared with the genuine signature.
Results: Statistically significant differences were reported at different confidence intervals in comparisons considering different combinations.
Conclusion: In conclusion, aside from similar depth of the indented pen pressure, persistence of dissimilarities in different comparison documents and at different points is an important criterion. It has been revealed that these differences are statistically significant.
Downloads
References
Gianelli P.C. The Supreme Court's Criminal Daubert Cases. Seton Hall. L. Rev.. 2002;33:1071
Jarman K.H., Hanlen R.C., Manzolillo P.A. Handwriting examination: Moving from Art to Science. Pacific Northwest National Lab.(PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); 1999 Apr 9. https://doi.org/10.2172/15001462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/5703
Sulner A. Critical Issues Affecting the Reliability and Admissibility of Handwriting Identification Opinion Evidence-How They Have Been Addressed (or Not) Since the 2009 NAS Report, and How They Should Be Addressed Going Forward: A Document Examiner Tells All. Seton Hall L. Rev.. 2017;48:631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3062250
Best practice manual for the forensic examination of handwriting. ENFSIBPM-FHX- 01, Version 02, June 2018
Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009
Vastrick T.W., Schuetzner E., Osborn K. Measuring the Frequency Occurrence of Handwritten Numeral Characteristics. J Forensic Sci. 2018 Jul;63(4):1215-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13678
Xu Z., Srihari S.N. Bayesian network structure learning and Inference Methods for Handwriting, Proceeding of 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition;2013 1320 – 1324: Washington, DC https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2013.267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2013.267
Davis L.J., Saunders C.P., Hepler A., Buscaglia J. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios, . Forensic Sci Int. ,2012;216:146-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.013
Bozza S., Taroni F., Marquis R., Schmittbuhl M. Probabilistic evaluation of handwriting evidence: likelihood ratio for authorship, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 2008;57:329-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2007.00616.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2007.00616.x
Bennour A., Djeddi C., Gattal A., Siddiqi I., Mekhaznia T. Handwriting based writer recognition using implicit shape codebook. Forensic Sci Int.. 2019 Aug; 1;301:91- 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.014
Chen X.H., Champod C., Yang X., Shi S.P., Luo Y.W., Wang N., Wang YC., Lu Q.M. Assessment of signature handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratio based on comparative measurement of relevant dynamic features. Int J of For Sci. 2018 Jan 1;282:101-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.022
Agius A., Morelato M., Moret S., Chadwick S., Jones K., Epple R., Brown J., Roux C. Using handwriting to infer a writer’s country of origin for forensic intelligence purposes. Int J of For Sci. 2018 Jan 1;282:144-56. https://doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.028
Johnson M.E., Vastrick T.W., Boulanger M., Schuetzner E. Measuring the frequency occurrence of handwriting and handprinting characteristics. J Forensic Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):142-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13248
Srihari SN., Huang C., Srinivasan H. On the discriminability of the handwriting of twins, J Forensic Sci., 2008;53:430-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00682.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00682.x
Hepler A.B., Saunders C.P., Davis L.J., Buscaglia J. Score-based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence, Forensic Sci Int.2012;219:129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.009
Srihari S.N. Computational methods for handwritten questioned document examination. NIJ Report 232745, 2010, Award Number:2004-IJ-CX-K050
Raymond M., Bozza S., Schmittbuhl M., Taroni F. Handwriting evidence evaluation based on the shape of characters: Application of multivariate likelihood ratios, J Forensic Sci., 2011;56:238-242 82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01602.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01602.x
Biedermann A., Voisard R., Taroni F. Learning about Bayesian networks for forensic interpretation: An example based on the problem of multiple propositions, Science and Justice, 2012;52:191-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2012.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2012.05.004
Taroni F., Marquis R., Schmittbuhl M., Biedermann A., Thiery A., Bozza S. The use of the likelihood ratio for evaluative and investigative purposes in comparative forensic handwriting examination, Forensic Sci Int., 2012 Jan;214:189-194. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.08.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.08.007
Marquis R., Schmittbuhl M., Mazzella W.D., Taroni F. Quantification of the shape of handwritten characters:a step to objective discrimination between writers based on the study of the capital character O, Forensic Sci Int., 2005;150:23-32. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.028
Srihari S.N., Singer K. Role of automation in the examination of hand written items, Pattern Recognition, 2014;47:1083-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2013.09.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2013.09.032
Tang Y., Srihari S.N. Likelihood ratio estimation in forensic identification using similarity and rarity, Pattern Recognition, 2014;47:945-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2013.07.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2013.07.014
Gould, J., Clement, S., Crouch, B., & King, R. S. Evaluation of photometric stereo and elastomeric sensor imaging for the non-destructive 3D analysis of questioned documents–A pilot study. Science & Justice, 2023;63(4), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2023.04.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2023.04.016
Aşıcıoğlu F. Differences in writing and signature due to changing conditions and factors. Aşıcıoğlu F ed. Handwriting and signature examinations in forensic sciences. İstanbul, Öner Print, 2007; 33-45 (Turkish translate).
Birincioğlu İ., Kurtaş Ö., Çakır İ., Turan N. “The Concept of Impression in Handwriting Analysis”, 6th Anatolian Forensic Sciences Congress, 6-9 Sep. 2007 Manisa, Proceeding, Celal Bayar University Matbaası, Manisa 2007, pp. 125-129. (Turkish translate).
Kurtaş Ö. Basic definitions and rules in handwriting (elements of handwriting diagnosis). Aşıcıoğlu F, ed. Handwriting and signature examinations in forensic sciences. İstanbul, Öner Print, 2007; 33-45. (Turkish translate).
Çakır İ. Working principles and practical use of devices used in the field of forensic document examination.Aşıcıoğlu F., ed. Handwriting and signature examinations in forensic sciences. İstanbul, Öner Print, 2007; 46-68 (Turkish translate).
Shanteau J., Stewart T.R. Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and comments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1992 Nov 1;53:95-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90057-E
Gatouillat A., Dumortier A., Perera S., Badr Y., Gehin C., Sejdić E. Analysis of the pen pressure and grip force signal during basic drawing tasks: The timing and speed changes impact drawing characteristics. Computers in biology and medicine. 2017 Aug;1;87:124-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.05.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.05.020
Cho K.I., Lee S.S., Ahn S. Inventors; Electronics, Telecommunications Research Institute, assignee. Device for measuring writing pressure of electronic pen. United States patent application US 13/535,507. 2013 Jun 6.
Hook C., Kempf J., Scharfenberg G. New pen device for biometrical 3D pressure analysis of handwritten characters, words and signatures. InProceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMM workshop on Biometrics methods and applications 2003 Nov 8 (pp. 38-44). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/982507.982515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/982507.982515
Mohammed LA, Found B, Caligiuri M, Rogers D. The dynamic character of disguise behavior for text-based, mixed, and stylized signatures. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56 Suppl 1:S136-S141 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01584.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01584.x
Li C.K, Wong S.K., Chim L.C.J. A Prototype of Mathematical Treatment of Pen Pressure Data for Signature Verification. J Forensic Sci, 2018; 63: 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13491
Mohammed L, Found B, Caligiuri M, Rogers D. Dynamic characteristics of signatures: effects of writer style on genuine and simulated signatures. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(1):89-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12605
Caligiuri MP, Kim C, Landy KM. Kinematics of signature writing in healthy aging. J Forensic Sci 2014;59(4):1020-1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12437
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Bulletin of Legal Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
