Considerations in Forensic Psychiatric Reports According to Supreme Court Reversal Decisions on Juvenile Delinquents

Forensic Psychiatric Reports of Juvenile Offenders

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1635

Keywords:

Discretion, Criminal Responsibility, Forensic Report, Juvenile Offender, Supreme Court

Abstract

Objectives: It is aimed to determine the causes of supreme court reversal in the field of forensic psychiatry on Juvenile Delinquents and identifying to issues be considered while preparing a report.

Materials and Methods: From website of the Supreme Court https://karararama.yargitay.gov.tr/YargitayBilgiBankasiIstemciWeb/,  691 reversal decisions on forensic psychiatric issues regarding juvenile delinquents were examined by using the words: “child psychiatry”, “child and adolescent mental health”, “child at the age of discretion”, “mental health, child”, “perceiving the legal meaning and consequences, directing their behaviour” and “the child delinquent”.

Results: It was determined that the most common reason for reversal in the evaluation of criminal responsibility by age in children (n:208, 36.3%) was the absence of social examination report or forensic psychiatric report, used of reports prepared for past crimes in the trial process, the second most common reason (n:169, 29.5%) was the reports which weren’t prepared duly and found insufficient in terms of content. In the evaluation of criminal responsibility due to mental illness, it was seen that the most common reason for reversal (n: 154, 40.5%) was that although mental illness was stated in the history of psychiatric illness, insufficient investigation was carried out on this subject, and that the second most common reason for reversal was (n: 130, 34.2%) the decision was made before delegation report was received.

Conclusion: It is important for the prepared reports to contain complete, reasoned and clear opinions, to prevent grievances due to the judicial process, and to protect the best interests of the child.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Güvenlik birimine gelen veya getirilen çocuk istatistikleri 2014. Erişim adresi https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Guvenlik-Birimine-Gelen-veya-Getirilen-Cocuklar-2014-18525 27.09.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Güvenlik birimine gelen veya getirilen çocuk istatistikleri 2021. Erişim adresi https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Guvenlik-Birimine-Gelen-veya-Getirilen-Cocuk-Istatistikleri-2021-45586 27.09.2022 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Dursun OB, Esin İS, Güleç M, Sener MT, Tas FV, Beyhun NE, Godekli M. A possible cause of trauma for children in justice system of turkey: attitudes of prosecutors and judges. Düşünen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 2013;26(4):367-375 doı: 10.5350/DAJPN2013260406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2013260406

Bilginer Ç, Tural-Hesapçıoğlu S, Kandil S. Bir üniversite hastanesine adli psikiyatrik muayene amacıyla gönderilen çocuk ve ergenlerin değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med. 2012; 9:20-27.

Aksu H, Karakoç Demirkaya S, Gürbüz Özgür B, Gün B. Aydın ilinde bir yıldaki çocuk ve ergen adli olguların değerlendirilmesi. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry. 2013; 14:369-377. doi: 10.5455/apd.43501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.43501

Karataş S. Suça sürüklenen çocuklar ve suç mağduru çocuklara yönelik bir değerlendirme. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar. 2020;12(4):575-586 doi: 10.18863/pgy.711319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.711319

Askay M. Çocuklarda Ceza Sorumluluğunun Değerlendirilmesi. Klinik Tıp Aile Hekimliği. 2017; 9(4): 15-18.

Ceza Sorumluluğu Değerlendirme Rehberi, 2010. Erişim adresi http://cocukhaklari.barobirlik.org.tr/dokuman/egitimbasvuru_basvuru/cezasorumlulugunun.pdf . 20.12.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Yıldız A. Çocuk ve ergenlerde nöroanatomik gelişimin çocuk ceza sorumluluğuna etkisi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2018;23(3):190-200 doi: 10.17986/blm.2018345606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2018345606

Karataş Z, Mavili A. Çocuk adalet sisteminde suça sürüklenen çocuklara yönelik uygulamalarda karşılaşılan sorunlar. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2019; 19(45):1013-1043. doı: 10.21560/spcd.v19i50781.519076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.v19i50781.519076

TBMM Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi, 5237 Sayılı Kanunun Geneli Hakkında Bilgiler, Ceza Sorumluluğunu Kaldıran veya Azaltan Sebepler, Yaş Küçüklüğü. Erişim Adresi https://mevzuat.tbmm.gov.tr/mevzuat/faces/kanunmaddeleri?pkanunlarno=24110&pkanunnumarasi=5237. 20.12.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Güler G, Sungur MA, Kütük MÖ. Evaluation of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the children dragged to crime. The Bulletin of Legal Medicine. 2018; 23(1):39–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2017332628

Avcil S, Avcil M, Yılmaz N (2018). Suça sürüklenen çocuk ve ergenlerin sosyodemografik ve klinik özellikleri. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2018;43(4):853-861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.350976

Keçelioğlu E. Ceza muhakemesi hukukunda gözlem altına alma. Ankara Barosu Dergisi. 2015;3;221-245.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Bertizlioğlu O, Çelik C. Considerations in Forensic Psychiatric Reports According to Supreme Court Reversal Decisions on Juvenile Delinquents: Forensic Psychiatric Reports of Juvenile Offenders. Bull Leg Med. 2023;28(2):112-120. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1635