The Role of Computer Technology in Detection of Forged Signatures Having Overlapping Features Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2015314263Keywords:
document examination, signature examination, computer technology, superimposition, overlappingAbstract
Signature is a handwriting type which reflects the personal characteristics and which is legally accepted to be exclusive. Various methods can be used for signature forgery and copying through carbon paper use is one of these methods. In this study, to show ‘overlapping’ with the method of superimposition of the signatures in computer media through analyzing the case of a signature forgery which includes the method of copying through carbon paper use and to discuss the role of computer technologies together with the differential diagnosis of ‘overlapping’ in document examination have been aimed. With regards to contemporary document examination expertise, besides personal experience, also computer technologies are becoming important in the analysis. In the evaluation of forgery components between two signatures or signature groups being identical to a degree which seems to be impossible in the nature of things (overlapping), this case and the way of its analysis is found
Downloads
References
Birincioğlu İ, Özkara E. Adli belge incelemelerinde bilinmeyenler, örneklerle yazı ve imza analizi ile ıslak imza kavramı. TBB Dergisi. 2010;87:403-33.
Aşıcıoğlu F. Adli Belge İncelemesi. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş., 2005: 61-7.
Sala S, Karslı Ö, Kıymaz L. Belge İncelemeleri. In: Cihangiroğlu B, editör. Adli Bilimler 1. Ankara: Jandarma Kriminal Daire Başkanlığı Yayınları, 2011: 269-349.
Alkan N. Adli Bilimlerde El Yazısı ve İmza İncelemeleri. In: Aşıcıoğlu F, editör. İmza Sahtecilikleri. İstanbul: Öner Matbaacılık, 2007: 148-57.
Yılmaz R. Tıbbi Belgelerde Yapılan Sahtecilikler. Uzmanlık tezi. Adalet Bakanlığı Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı. İstanbul: 2003.
Yılmaz R, Birincioğlu İ, Bütün C, Günaydın U, Yılmaz S. Pul nakli ile yapılan imza sahteciliği: olgu sunumu. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2004;9(3):91-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.200493556
Aydoğdu E, Ataç Y. İmza sahteciliğinin türleri, tespiti ve önlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Police Studies. 2011;13(2):49-71.
Yılmaz R, Koç S. Adli belge incelemeciliğinin dünyadaki tarihsel gelişim (II). Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med. 2006;3(3):101-6.
Hamzaoğlu N, Yavuz F, Çakır İ. Üzeri kaplanmış yazıların spektral ve hiperspektral yöntemlerle analizi. Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2008;22(3):22-34.
Birincioğlu İ, Kurtaş Ö, Çakır İ, Toprak S. El yazısı incelemelerinde hız kavramı. 6. Anadolu Adli Bilimler Kongresi; 6-9 Eylül 2007 Sözel ve Poster Bildiriler Kitabı, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Matbaası, Manisa 2007;121-4.
Mane M. Signs of traced signature in forgery. IJAR. 2014;4(6):213-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/June2014/66
Birincioğlu İ. Örneklerle El Yazısı İnceleme Teknikleri ve Prensipleri. In: Aşıcıoğlu F, editor. İmza Sahtecilikleri. İstanbul: Öner Matbaacılık, 2007: 122-47.
Yılmaz R, Koç S. Adli belge incelemeciliğinin tarihsel gelişimi (I). Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med. 2006;3(2):72-8.
Mathyer J. The expert examination of signatures. J Crim L Criminology & Police Sci. 1961;52(1):122-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1141512
Lin SF, Chang YW, Su CK. A study on Chinese carbon-signature recognition. J Inf Sci Eng. 2002;18(2):257-80.
Autopen. Erişim adresi: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopen. Erişim tarihi: 09/01/2014.
facts about the autopen. Erişim adresi: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/autopen-barack-obama-10-facts-85720.html. Erişim tarihi: 09/01/2014.
When a robot signs a bill: a brief history of the autopen. Erişim adresi: http://www.nationaljournal.com/whitehouse/when-a-robot-signs-a-bill-a-brief-history-of-the-autopen-20130103. Erişim tarihi: 09/01/2014.
Hamilton C. The Robot That Helped To Make A President: A Reconnaissance Into the Mysteries of John F. Kennedy's Signature. New York: Charles Hamilton Autographs, 1965.
Popular Mechanics Magazine 1937;67(5):657. Erişim adresi: http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=_toDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA657&dq#v=onepage&q&f=false. Erişim tarihi: 09/01/2014.
Automated signature technology. Erişim adresi: http://www.signaturemachine.com. Erişim tarihi: 09/01/2014.
Kamel NS, Sayeed S, Ellis GA. Glove-based approach to online signature verification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2008;30(6):1109-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.32
Maneechot T, Kitjaidure Y. Signature Verification Using N-tuple Learning Machine. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005;3:2794-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1617053
Gruber C, Gruber T, Krinninger S, Sick B. Online signature verification with support vector machines based on LCSS kernel functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2010;40(4):1088-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2034382
Wu QZ, Jou IC, Lee SY. On-line signature verification using LPC cepstrum and neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 1997;27(1):148-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.552197
Mohammed LA, Found B, Caligiuri M, Rogers D. The Dynamic Character of Disguise Behavior for Text-based, Mixed, and Stylized Signatures. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(1):136-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01584.x
Brault JJ, Plamondon R. A Complexity Measure of Handwritten Curves: Modeling of Dynamic Signature Forgery. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1993;23(2):400-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/21.229453
Zheng Y, Li H, Doermann D. Machine printed text and handwriting identification in noisy document images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004;26(3):337-53.
Bicego M, Murino V. Investigating Hidden Markov Models' capabilities in 2D shape classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004;26(2):281-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1262200
Van Bao L, Garcia-Salicetti S, Dorizzi B. On using the Viterbi path along with HMM likelihood information for online signature verification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2007;37(5):1237-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2007.895323
Thakoor N, Gao J, Jung S. Hidden Markov model-based weighted likelihood discriminant for 2-D shape classification. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007;16(11):2707-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2007.908076
Argones Rúa E, Alba Castro JL. Online Signature Verification Based on Generative Models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2012 Apr 4. [Epub ahead of print] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2188508
Zheng Y, Li H, Doermann D. Machine printed text and handwriting identification in noisy document images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004;26(3):337-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1262324
Ahmad SM, Ling LY, Anwar RM, Faudzi MA, Shakil A. Analysis of the effects and relationship of perceived handwritten signature's size, graphical complexity, and legibility with dynamic parameters for forged and genuine samples. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(3):724-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12075
Sita J, Found B, Rogers DK. Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47(5):1117-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS15521J
Dewhurst T, Found B, Rogers D. Are expert penmen better than lay people at producing simulations of a model signature? Forensic Sci Int 2008;180(1):50-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.06.009
Found B, Rogers DK. Investigating forensic document examiners' skill relating to opinions on photocopied signatures. Sci Justice. 2005;45(4):199-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(05)71667-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
