Keywords
divorce
violence against women
domestic violence
Abstract
While violence against women is an important public health problem with its negative impacts over physical and emotional health of women alongside ruining their social statuses, it is also considered as a field of forensic medicine which covers the judicial and human rights aspects of the problem. In the present study, we aimed to determine cases involving violence against women committed by their husbands and identify their characteristics among divorce suits tried between 2005-2009 in Van province,. By reviewing the files and records of divorce cases in the court archive which had been finalized between 2005-2009, we found and analyzed 193 cases involving violence and determined the ones that ended with an order of protection for the abused. Among those 193 cases, mean value for age of women was 31,39 (+8,46), number of children was 2,07 (+1,82), and official duration of marriage was 9,27 years (+8,36 years). As the mean rate of forensic/medical report presence in the files involving violence was 19,2%, the rate of issuing protection order in coordinance with Law No. 4320 was found to increase at a steady pace each year and determined to exhibit a mean rate of 15,5%. Court records and medical reporting procedures should be standardized for divorce suits and all cases of domestic violence. Informing and instructing judges, attorneys, and lawyers along with amelioration of the coordination among courts, social services network, forensic medicine units, and hospital emergency departments, should contribute in more efficient execution of Law No. 4320.
Key words: Family court, divorce, violence against women, domestic violence
References
Akın A. Kadının statüsü ve sağlığı ile ilgili gerçekler, Editör. T.C Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü, Afşaroğlu Matbaası, Ankara 2008:5-50.
Polat O. Klinik Adli Tıp, Adli Tıp Uygulamaları, Editör.
Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık A.Ş; 2006:177-192.
Violence Against Women. What WHO is doing, http://www.who.int./gender/violence/en/vl0.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 21.04.2009
Chalk R, King P, eds. Violence in Families: Assessing Prevention and Treatment Programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
Hacettepe Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. Türkiye’de kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet araştırması-özet rapor. T.C.Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 2009.
Karaduman F, Subaşı N. Buzdağının görünen kısmı: Adli kurumlara yansıyan eşlerearası şiddet vakaları. Uluslararası Katılımlı I. Ulusal Çevre Hekimliği Kongresi, Ankara, 8- 12 Aralık 1997, Kongre Kitabı: 150
Campbell J, Jones AS, Dieneman J, Kub J, Schollenberger J at all. Intimate partner violence and physical health con- cequences. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1157-63.
Coker AL, Smith PH, Bethea L, King MR, McKeown RE. Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:451-7.
Perez IR, Castano JP. Intimate partner violence and mental health consequences in women attending family practice in Spain. Psychosomatic Medicine 2005;67:791-7.
Perez IR, Castano JP, Lozano MR. Physical health consequences of intimate partner violence in Spanish women. Europen Journal of Public Health 2007;17(5):437-43.
Lopez KC, Kruttschnitt C, Macmillan R. Patterns of intimate partner violence and their associations with physical health, psychological distress, and substance use. Public Health Reports 2006;121:382-92.
Stevenson TR, Goodall EA, Moore CBT. A retrospective audit of the extent and nature of domestic violence cases identified over a three year period in the two district command units of the police service of Northern Ireland. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2008;15:430-6.
Wathen CN, MacMillan HL. Interventions for violence against women. Scientific review. JAMA 2003;289(5): 589-600.
Adalet Bakanlığı Mevzuat. Ailenin Korunmasına Dair Kanun. http://www.mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr/litml/888.litml Erişim Tarihi: 11.05.2009
Walker R, Logan TK, Jordan CE, Campbel JC. An integrative review of separation in the context of victimization: consequences and implications for women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 2004;5 (2): 143-93.
Logan TK, Walker R. Separation as a risk factor for victims of intimate partner violence: beyond lethality and injury: a response to Campbell. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2004;19:1478-86
T.C Van Valiliği. Van ilinin şehir ve köylere göre 2008 nüfus dağılımı, http://www.van.gov.tr/nufus/nufus.php Erişim Tarihi: 17.05.2009
Celbiş O, Gökdoğan MR, Kaya M, Güneş G. Review of forensic assessments of female referais to the branch of legal medicine, Malatya region, Turkey-1996-2000. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine 2006;13:21-5.
Kendall J, Pelucio MT, Casaletto J, Thompson KP, Barnes S at al. Inpact of emergency department intimate partner violence intervention. Journal of Interpersonel Violence 2009;24(2):280-306.
Arslan M, Yarımoğlu B, Çekin N, Hilal A. Eş şiddeti öyküsüyle adli tıp kurumu Adana şube müdürlüğüne başvuran olguların incelenmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med 2005;2:39-43.
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.