Evaluation of Toxicological Analysis Results and Treatment Applications in Cases Registered for Drug Addiction at Parole Branch office of Trabzon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2009142693Keywords:
parole, drug, addictionAbstract
Substance use, increased rapidly all over the world and our country become a very important social problem, to take legal measures were made compulsory parole is the conditional release of a prison inmate after serving part (if not all) of his or her sentence, allowing the inmate to live in the community under supervision of the parole period. Parole and Aid Centers, which were put in effect by Ministry of Justice in the context of membership process of EU, set up as a social service on 20 July 2005 with a law which went into effect after being published in Official Gazette. At this study, 201 (47.2%) cases, which contained drug addiction were examined out of 425 cases in total, which were registered to Branch Directorate of Trabzon Parole between the dates of 21 December 2005 and 30 June 2008. The cases were grouped in terms of age, gender, education level, occupation, drugs used, treatment, and toxicological analysis results. The rates of drug using for men are 98.5% (n = 198), and for women 1.5% (n=3). The ages of cases were ranked between 17 and 64, the average age was found as 32.47 ± 10.55 years. The frequency of drug use is most in the age group of 27-36 (39.8%, n=80). As a result, parole application, which is rather new in Turkey, has puts on the agenda with a chance of being addictive were recovered to the society by being followed and treated. The reluctance of guilty people returning to the prison again, the effect on individual of being considered important by system, and illuminating information which were given by educator, and treatment performance indicate positive effect on the guilty.
Key words: Parole, drug, addiction
Downloads
References
Belenko S. The impact of drag offenders on the criminal justice system. Drags, crime and criminal justice system. Weighed R(Ed), Anderson Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OH, 1990:27-78
Chari K, Baker JR, Lattirnore PK. A decision support system for partial drag testing: DSS-DT. Decision Support system 1998;23(3):241-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00047-5
Denetimli Serbestlik ve Yardım Merkezleri ile Koruma Kuralları Yönetmeliği; Resmi Gazete.18 Nisan 2007, Sayı:26497
Çolak H, Altun U. Denetimli serbestlik kavrammın yaptırım teorisi ve pedolojik bakımdan tahlili ile pozitif hukuktaki düzenlemeler, www.yayin.adalet. gov.tr/dergi /25 sayı.htm. Erişim tarihi:23.03.2007.
Drummer OH. Chromatographic screening techniques in systematic toxicological analysis. J Chroma- togr B Biomed Sei Appl 1999;733(l-2):27-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(99)00265-0
Gjerde H, Christophersen AS, Skuterad B, Klemet- sen K, Morland J. Screening for drags in forensic blood samples using EMIT urine assays. Forensic Sei Int 1990;44(2-3): 179-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(90)90248-W
Decaestecker TN, Coopman EM, Van Peteghem CH, Van Bocxlaer JF. Suitability testing of commercial solid-phase extraction sorbents for sample cleanup in systematic toxicological analysis using liquid chromatography (tandem) mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sei 2003;789(l):19-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(03)00208-3
Maralikova B, Weinman W. Confirmatory analysis for drags of abuse in plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with respect to criteria for compound identification. J ChromatogrB Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sei 2004;811(l):21-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.04.039
Gronholm M, Lillsunde P. A comparison between on-site immunoassay drug testing devices and laboratory results. Forensic Sei Int 2001;121(l-2):37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00451-0
Perrone J, De Roosf, Ayaraman S, Judd E. Hollander drag screening versus history in detection of substance use in ED psychiatric patients. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2001;19(1):49-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/ajem.2001.20003
Kidwell DA, Kidwell JD, Shinohara F, Harper C, Roarty K, Bemadt K, McCatdley RA, Smith FP. Comparison of daily urine, sweat and skin swabs among cocaine users. For Sei Int 2003;133(l-2,23):63-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00051-3
Lambert WE, Van Bocxlaer JF, De Leenheer AP. Potential of high performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection in forensic toxicology. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sei Appl 1997;689(l):45-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(96)00305-2
Thieme D, Sachs H. Improved screening capabilities in forensic toxicology by application of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta 2003;492(1-2):171-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00563-4
Lu NT, Taylor BG. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS:Comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS aganist 10 drug between US and England laboratories. For Sei Int 2006;157(2-3):106-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.03.022
www.drugabuse.gov/Infofacts/cjtreatment html. Erişim Tarihi:02.06.2007
Chang g, Kosten TR. Detoxification Substance Abuse 4. basım. Philadelphia, PA, USA, Lippincott Williams Wilkins Pres 2005:579-587.
Nolan JLJr. Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm. Subst Use Misuse 2002;37(12-13):1723-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014428
Hagan J, Coleman JP. Returning captives of American war on drugs; Issues of community and family reentry. Crime and Delinquency 2001;47(3):352- 367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128701047003004
Folino JO. Risk Assessment and violent recidivism risk management in convict from Argentina research in social problems and puclic policy Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, 2005;(12):75-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-1152(05)12004-3
http.//www.samhsa.gov/shin.Department of He- alty&Human Services.USA
Subramanian GA, Stitzer MA. Clinical characteristics of treatment-seeking prescription opioids vs. heroin-using adolescents with opioid use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008;99(3): 141-149.
Solomon P, Draine J, Marcus SC. Predicting incarceration of clients of a psychiatric services; probation and parole services. Psychiatric Services 2002;53(l):50-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.53.1.50
Pelissier B, Wallace S, O’Neil JA, Gaes GG. Federal prison residential drug treatment reduces substance use and arrests and release. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2001;(27):315-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/ADA-100103712
Evens E, Li L, Hser Y. Treatment entry barriers among California’s proposition 36 offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2008;(35):410-418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2008.03.003
Boles SM, Miotto K. Substance abuse and violence; A review of the literature, aggression and violent behavior 2003;8(2):155-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00057-X
Teplin LA, Abram KM, Mc Clelland GM. Does psychiatric disorder predict violent crime among released jail detainees? A six- year longitudinal study. Am Psychol 1994;49(4):335-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.4.335
Lo CC. Sociodemographic factors, drug abuse and other crimes: How they vary among male and female arrestees. J Crim Justice 2004;32(5):399-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.06.002
Baumer E, Lauritsen JL, Rosenfelci R, Wright R. The influence of crack cocaine on robbery, burglary and homicide rates: A cross-city, longitudinal analysis. Journal of research in crime and delinquency 1998;35(3):316-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427898035003004
Hartwell SW. The organizational response to community re-entry research in social problems and public policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, 2005; (12): 197-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-1152(05)12010-9
Hernandez-Avila CA,Burleson J, Poling J, Tennen H, Rounsaville BJ, Kranzler HR. Personality and substance use disorders as predictors of criminality. Compr Psychiatry 2000;41(4):276-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2000.7423
Yılmaz R, Şahin E, İnci Y, Suyolcu S, Mutlu H, De- miröz Avcı S, Karataş Z, Birincioğlu İ. Rize ili denetimli serbestlik ve yardım merkezi şube müdürlüğüne 2006 yılı şubat-eylül döneminde gelen olguların analizi. E-Dergi 2008;(5):37-40.
Altıntoprak EA, Akgür SA, Coşkunol H. Yasa dışı madde kullanımı nedeniyle denetimli serbestlik tedbiri uygulanan kişilerde tedavi uygulamaları ve tok- sikolojik Analiz. Türkiye’de Psikiyatri 2007;9 (3):165-172.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
