Different Outcomes in Two Sexual Abuse Cases due to Different Interpretation of the Same Article

Authors

  • Sema Demirçin Akdeniz Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı
  • Süleyman Melik Sarıkçıoğlu Adli Tıp Kurumu Antalya Grup Başkanlığı

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2007123648

Keywords:

abortion, termination of pregnancy, sexual abuse, turkish penal code

Abstract

The 6th subsection of article 99 of Turkish Penal Code, brought a new point of view to the termination of pregnancy when is due to a crime.The subsection stated that when performed by the specialist in hospital environment with the approval of the victim, termination of pregnancy not above 20 weeks will not result in punishment of the performer. In this article, 2 of the cases under 18 years of age refered to our department for paternity testing with DNA-STR test were reported. The common feature of the cases was the gestational age above 10 weeks. For both cases termination of the unwanted pregnancy seemed the sole solution. After the pschyiatric evalutiaon of the victims and urgent serial correspondence between physicians and legal authorities the termination of pregnancy was performed for one of the cases. The other case was discharged and given to her family to deliver the unwanted child as the conditions in the law were not provided. Our aim is to point out the discrepancies in interpretation of the law between medical and between legal practitioners and the troubles taking place in practice.

Key words: Abortion, termination of pregnancy, sexual abuse, Turkish Penal Code

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Report of The Fourth World Conference on Women, United Nations, (Beijing, 4-15 September 1995), www.un.org/esa/gopher-data/conf/fwcw/ off/a--20.en

Cook R J. Developments in abortion laws comparative and international perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sei 2000;913:74-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05163.x

Berer M. Global perspectives national laws and unsafe abortion: The parameters of change. Reproductive Health Matter 2004;12(24):l-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24024-1

Alman Ceza Kanunu, Hayata karşı suçlar. Madde 218’in uygulanamadığı durumlar, www.abtreibung- web.de/P_218/p_218.html

Bulut A. Abortion law reform: The Turkish experience. Reproductive Health Matter 2001;9(17):210- 211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(01)90028-X

Rahman A, Katzive L, Henshaw S K. A Global review of laws on induced abortion. 1985-1997. International Family Planning Perspectives 1998;24(2):56-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2991926

World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: Global and regional estimates of incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000. 4th ed. Geneva, 2004. www.who.int/reproductive-health/ publications/unsafe_abortion_estima- tes_04/estimates.pdf

Rahim Tahliyesi ve Sterilizasyon Hizmetlerinin Yürütülmesi ve Denetlenmesine ilişkin Tüzük. www.mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr/html/5130.html

Türk Ceza Kanunu (sayı :5237)

Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women : Turkey. 31/01/97. A/52/38/Rev.l,paras.l51-206.

Parlar A, Hatipoğlu M. 5237 sayılı Türk Ceza Kanunu Yorumu, lth ed.Ankara, 2007:813-817.

Downloads

Published

2007-12-01

Issue

Section

Case Report

How to Cite

1.
Demirçin S, Sarıkçıoğlu SM. Different Outcomes in Two Sexual Abuse Cases due to Different Interpretation of the Same Article. Bull Leg Med. 2007;12(3):118-124. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2007123648