The Area of Foramen Magnum Its Applicability for Sex Determination

Authors

  • Yasemin Günay Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı
  • Muzaffer Altınkök Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı
  • Sadi Çağdır Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı
  • Hüseyin Sarı Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.199832296

Keywords:

foramen magnum, sex determination

Abstract

In unidentified skeletons, sex determination is rarely easily and correctly performed. In explosions, warfare and other mass disasters like aircraft crashes, identification is also difficult because of skeletal fragmentation. In the present study we attempted to evaluate whether the area of the foramen magnum is a useful criterion for sex determination in fragmented skulls. In a total of 146 skeletons ( 121 males and 25 females ) the longest and the shortest diameter of the foramen magnum was measured; the circle area was determinated with the mean of the diameters as the radius. Foramen magnum areas of 922 qmm and greater were predominantly appointed to male, values lower than 821 qmm predominantly to female skulls. Values greater than 821 qmm and lower than 922 qmm form the group of unidentified skulls. 69 % of males were found to be within 922 qmm ± 1 SD (122 qmm), 68 % of females within 821 qmm ±1 SD (127 qmm).

Key words: Foramen magnum, sex determination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Krogman WM, İşcan MY. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. Second ed. Springfield Illinois: Charles Thomas Publisher, 1986: 189-243-

Jensen S. Identification of Human Remains Lacking Skull and Teeth. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 1991; 12 ( 2): 93-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-199106000-00001

Longia GS. Anthropometrical Features Laryngeal Cartilages. Adli Tıp Dergisi 1990;6: 141-48.

Theixeria WRG. Sex Identification Utilizing the Size of the Foramen Magnum. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 1982; 3 ( 3): 203-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-198209000-00003

Bennett KA. A Field Guide for Human Skeletal Identification. Springfield Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Pub., 1987:14-16.

Fatteh A.Handbook of Forensic Pathology. J.B.Lippincott.Philadelphia,1973:51-59.

Moore-Jansen PH, Ousley SD, Jantz RL. Data Collection Procedures for Forensic Skeletal Material. Report of Investigations no.48, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Forensic Anthropology Center, 1994: 56-7.

Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standarts for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas Archeological Survey Researh Series No.44, 1994:77.

Altınkök M. Işmbilimde (Radyolojide) Özel Adlı Belirtiler, Bulgular ve Hastalıklar. İ.Ü.Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Yayınları. Yörük Matbabası,1983: 128.

Downloads

Published

1998-08-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Günay Y, Altınkök M, Çağdır S, Sarı H. The Area of Foramen Magnum Its Applicability for Sex Determination. Bull Leg Med. 1998;3(2):41-45. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.199832296