Sex Determination From Recognizable Vertebrae
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2013181257Keywords:
sex determination, pretoria bone collection, vertebrae forensic anthropology, crime sceneAbstract
Sex determination is one of the first steps in human identification. Many parts of the skeleton have already being analyzed and appropriate techniques developed. Vertebrae are among the least studied bones yet its presence at a death scene is the most common of all. The purpose of this presentation is to analyze sexual variation in South African white and black populations from the Pretoria Bone Collection. The sample is composed of complete vertebrae from 144 individuals. Seven measurements were taken from each of the C7, T1, T11, T12 and L5 with a digital caliper sensitive to 0.01 mm. These bones were selected because of their being recognized easily due to their anatomy and position in the vertebral column. Sex differences were assessed using the discriminant function procedure in SPSS. The analysis provided an accuracy rate of 89% in whites and 85% in blacks. When each bone with its seven dimensions entered into the stepwise procedure only 2 or less were selected to separate one sex from the other. Accuracy rate ranged from 89% in white and 84% in black T1s. The least dimorphic of all was 80% in white and 64% in black L5s. It is clear that vertebra is as dimorphic as many of the long bones. It has certain advantages over others because there are many of them in a crime scene. In studying vertebral column the difficulty is to identify the sequence of each bone when several are missing. This study used those that are readily identifiable.
Keywords: Sex determination, Pretoria Bone Collection, vertebrae forensic anthropology, crime scene.
Downloads
References
Giles E, and Elliot O. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1963, 21:53-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330210108
Loth SR, and Henneberg M. Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996, 99:473-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199603)99:3<473::AID-AJPA8>3.0.CO;2-X
Rogers TL. Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology. J Forensic Sci. 2005, 50(3):493-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2003385
Tague RG. Variation in pelvic size between males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989, 80:59-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330800108
Patriquin ML. A comparative analysis of differences in the pelves of South African blacks and whites. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria, Faculty of Medicine. 2001.
Duric M, Rakocevic Z, and Donic D. The reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans. Forensic Sci Int. 2005, 147(2-3):159-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.111
İşcan MY, and Miller-Shaivitz P. Determination of sex from the femur in blacks and whites. Coll. Antropol. 1984, 8(2):169-175.
İşcan MY, and Miller-Shaivitz P. Determination of sex from the tibia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984, 64(1):53-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330640104
Steyn M, and İşcan MY. (1997). Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites. Forensic Sci Int. 90(1-2):111-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00156-4
Steyn M, and İşcan MY. Osteometric variation in the humerus: Sexual dimorphism in South Africans. Forensic Sci Int. 1999, 106(2):77-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00141-3
Dayal MR, and Bidmos MA. Discriminant sex in South African blacks using patella dimensions. J Forensic Sci. 2005, 50(6):1294-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2004306
Haglund WD, and Simmons T. Archeology, excavation and retrieval of remains. In J Payne-James, R Byard, T Corey and C Henderso (eds.). Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine. London. Academic Press, 2005, pp. 89-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369399-3/00016-1
Krogman WM, and İşcan MY. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. 1986
Steyn M, and İşcan MY. Bone pathology and ante-mortem trauma in forensic cases. In J Siegel, P Saukko and G Knupfer (eds.). Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences. London: Academic Press, 2000, pp. 217-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/rwfs.2000.0759
İşcan MY, and McCabe BQ. Animal effects on human remains. In J Siegel, P Saukko and G Knupfer (eds.). Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences. London: Academic Press, 2000, pp. 198-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/rwfs.2000.0762
MacLaughlin SM, and Oldale KN. Vertebral body diameters and sex prediction. Ann Hum Biol. 1992, 19(3):285-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014469200002152
Ortner DJ, and Putschar WGJ. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. 1991
Brothwell DR. Digging up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment and Study of Human Skeletal Remains. Ithaca, NY. Cornell University Press. 1981
Merbs CF. Trauma. In MY İşcan and KAR Kennedy (eds.). Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton. New York. Wiley-Liss, 1989, pp. 161-189.
Hollinshead WH. Functional Anatomy of the Limbs and Back. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W. B. Saunders Company. 1969
Taylor JR, and Twomey LT. Sexual dimorphism in human vertebral body shape. J Anat. 1984, 138(2):281-6.
Liguoro D, Vandermeersch B, and Guerin J. Dimensions of cervical vertebral bodies according to age and sex. Surg Radiol Anat. 1994, 16(2):149-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01627588
Wescott DJ. Sex variation in the second cervical vertebra. J Forensic Sci. 2000, 45(2):462-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14707J
Marlow EJ, and Pastor RF. Sex determination using the second cervical vertebra--A test of the method. J Forensic Sci. 2011, 56(1):165-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01543.x
L'Abbe EN, Loots M, and Meiring JH. The Pretoria Bone Collection: a modern South African skeletal sample. Forensic Sci Int. 2005, 56(26):197-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2004.10.004
White TD, and Folkens PA. Human Osteology. California: Academic Press, Inc.1991
Bass WM. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. Missouri. Missouri Archaeological Society. 1995
Arıncı K, and Elhan A. Anatomi 1. Cilt. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi. 2001
Lewin R. Modern İnsanın Kökeni. Ankara: Tübitak. 1998
Nakatsukasa M. Acquisition of bipedalism: the Miocene hominoid record and modern analogues for bipedal protohominids. 2004, J Anat. 204(5):385-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00290.x
Lovejoy CO. The natural history of human gait and posture. Part 1. Spine and pelvis. Gait Posture 2005, 21(1):95-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(04)00014-1
Raynal P, Le Meaux JP, and Chéreau E. Anthropologic evolution of women's pelvis. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005, 33(7-8):464-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.05.017
Haeusler M, Martelli SA, and Boeni T. Vertebrae numbers of the early hominid lumbar spine. J Hum Evol. 2002, 43(5):621-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2002.0595
Latimer B. The Perils of Being Bipedal. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33(1-2):3-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-8957-8
Hoyme LES, and İşcan MY. Determination of Sex and Race: Accuracy and Assumptions. In: M İşcan, Y and KAR Kennedy (eds.). Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton. Alan R. Liss, 1989, pp. 53-93.
Isaac B. Biometry of the posterior border of the human hip bone: normal values and their use in sex determination. J Anat Soc India 2002, 51(1):43-6.
Purkait R. Sex determination from femoral head measurements: a new approach. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2003, 5(Suppl 1):347-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1344-6223(02)00169-4
Murphy AM. The femoral head: Sex assessment of prehistoric New Zealand Polynesian skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2005, 154(2-3):210-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.011
Hauser R, Smolinski J, and Gos T. The estimation of stature on the basis of measurements of the femur. Forensic Sci Int. 2005, 147(2-3):185-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.070
González-Reimers E, Velasco-Vázquez J, Arnay-de-la-Rosa M, and Santolaria-Fernández F. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the right tibia in the prehispanic population of the Canary Islands. Forensic Sci Int. 2000, 108(3):165-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00205-4
Celbiş O, and Ağrıtmış H. Estimation of stature and determination of sex from radial and ulnar bone lengths in a Turkish corpse sample. Forensic Sci Int. 2006, 158(2-3):135-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.05.016
Mall G, Hubig M, Büttner A, Kuznik J, Penning R, and Graw M. Sex determination and estimation of stature from the long bones of the arm. Forensic Sci Int. 2001, 117(1-3):23-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00445-X
Yu SB, Lee UY, Kwak DS, Ahn YW, Jin CZ, Zhao J, Sui HJ, and Han SH. Determination of sex for the 12th thoracic vertebra by morphometry of three-dimensional reconstructed vertebral models. J Forensic Sci. 2008, 53(3):620-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00701.x
Jenkins T. Genetic variation and disease in southern African peoples. In R Singer and JK Lundy (eds.). Variation, Culture and Evolution in African Populations. Johannesburg, Witwatersrand University Press, 1986, pp. 143-58.
Macho GA. Is sexual dimorphism in the femur a "population specific phenomenon?". Z Morphol Anthropol. 1990, 78(2):229-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/zma/78/1990/229
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
