Evaluation of Physicians Opinions About Euthanasia According to Their Frequency to Encounter Death

Authors

  • Cem Uysal Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp AD.
  • Bekir Karaaslan Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp AD.
  • Halis Tanrıverdi Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Aile Hekimliği AD.
  • Tahsin Çelepkolu Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Aile Hekimliği AD.
  • Mustafa Korkmaz Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp AD.
  • Kasım Bulut Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp AD.
  • Yasin Bez Marmara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri AD.
  • Yaşar Tıraşçı Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp AD.
  • Erdem Özkara Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp AD.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2013183255

Keywords:

euthanasia, death, physicians

Abstract

Introduction Euthanasia is the medical and painless practice of ending the life of a patient through an omission or an act performed on his/her own request, or the permission of his/her legal guardian or heirs if the person cannot give a declaration of intent, in order to end his/her suffering due to an untreatable and pity-evoking disease. This study compares the opinions of the physicians dealing with severely ill or terminal patients with the opinions of the physicians dealing with non-terminal patients on euthanasia.

 

Material and Method Our survey was conducted on the physicians who served at the basic sciences and hemodialysis departments, intensive care units, hematology and oncology wards, and internal medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry and physical therapy clinics of the medical faculty hospitals of the Dicle and Gaziantep Universities during the year 2013. The opinions of 169 individuals on gender, age, marital status, number of children, family structure, the department they work in, the frequency they are faced with death, professional experience, presence of any bedridden relatives, and their  view on requesting euthanasia for themselves or their relatives  were asked for the purposes of the study.

 

Results Among the subjects included in the survey, 60 (35.5%) were female while 109 (64.5% were male. In terms of the marital status, 105 (62.1%) were married, 63 (37.3%) were single and 1 (0.6%) was widowed. Eighty-five subjects (50.3%) declared that they may think of euthanasia depending on the age and diagnosis, 20 (11.8%) were undecided, while 64 subjects (37.9%) stated that they would never think of euthanasia even in a terminal case.

 

Discussion and Conclusion Beyond its medical and legal aspects, euthanasia is also associated with people’s emotional state and belief systems. Whether it is active or passive, euthanasia is a very grave decision for health professionals, patients, and relatives of the patients.

Key Words: Euthanasia, Death, Physicians

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mustafa Korkmaz, Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp AD.
    Araştırma görevlisi

References

Özkan N. Türk Ceza Hukukunda Ötenazi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi; 1997:103.

Kıyak Y. Lectures on medical ethics. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi; 1987.

Karahisar F. Ölümcül Hasta, Hemşire Ve Hekimlerin Ölüm Ve Ötenaziye İlişkin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Hemşirelik Esasları Anabilim Dalı. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi; 2006:2-15.

Nehir S, Kardeniz G, Altıparmak S, et al. Üniversite öğrencilerinin ötanaziye ilişkin düşünceleri: bir yüksekokul örneği. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2006;1:26-36.

Ozkara E, Civaner M, Oglak S, et al. Euthanasia education for health professionals in Turkey: students change their opinions. Nursing ethics. 2004;11:290-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733004ne.696oa

İnceoğlu S. Ölme hakkı (Ötanazi). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları; 1999.

Özalp İ. Ötenazi Olayı. 2003. Available at: http://www.hukukcu.com/bilimsel/kitaplar/otenazi.htm.

Güven K. Kişilik hakları ve ötanazi. Nobel yayın; 2000.

Turla A, Ozkara E, Ozkanli C, et al. Health professionals' attitude toward euthanasia: a cross-sectional study from Turkey. Omega. 2006;54:135-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/5492-3833-7541-3160

Özkara E, Özdemir Ç, Hancı İH, et al. Ankara’da Çalışan Hekimlerin Ötenaziye Yaklaşımı. 2002. Available at: http://auhf.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/auhfd-arsiv/AUHF-2002-51-04/AUHF-2002-51-04-Hanci-Ozkara-Civaner.pdf. Accessed 03 Aralık 2002.

Tepehan S, Ozkara E, Yavuz MF. Attitudes to euthanasia in ICUs and other hospital departments. Nursing ethics. 2009;16:319-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733009102693

Ozkara E, Hanci H, Civaner M, et al. Turkey's physicians' attitudes toward euthanasia: a brief research report. Omega. 2004;49:109-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/E88C-UXA5-TL9T-RVLK

Petek H. Sağlık Hukuku. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi web-ofset 2013.

Elçioğlu Şaylıgil Ö, Gündüz T, Köşgeroğlu N. Tıp, Hukuk ve Etik Açıdan euthanasia. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Ethics-Law and History. 1994;2:64.

Döndüren H. İslâm'da intihar niye günahtır? İntihar. Available at: http://www.msxlabs.org/forum/muslumanlik-islamiyet/59087-islam-dininde-intihar-ve-hukmu.html. Accessed 29 Ekim, 2012.

Hristiyanlık'ta intihar. Available at: http://www.hristiyanforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=336513. Accessed 07 Temmuz, 2013.

Yahudi yaşamı: Yaşam. Available at: http://www.projetaladin.org/holocaust/tr/bir-meslemanin-yahudilik-rehberi/yahudi-yaami.html2009.

Budist öğreti intihara karşı. Available at: http://haber.marmara.edu.tr/budist-ogreti-intihara-karsi/. Accessed 26 Aralık 2012.

Özkara E. Ötanazide temel kavramlar ve ötanaziyle ilgili güncel tartışmalar. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2001.

Özkara E. Ötanaziye Farklı Bir Bakış: Belçika’da Ötanazi Uygulaması ve Ülkemizdeki Durum. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi. 2008;78:105-122.

Shekhar S, Goel A. Euthanasia: India's position in the global scenario. The American journal of hospice & palliative care. 2013;30:628-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909112465941

Karaca S. İnsan Hakları ve Hasta Hakları Bağlamında Ötenazi. 2005. Available at: www.hukuki.net. Accessed Nisan, 2005.

Gamsız Bilgin N. Euthanasia: Definition And History Of Euthanasia-Ötanazi: Tanım ve Tarihçe. Lokman Hekim Journal of History of Medicine and Folk Medicine. 2013;3:25-31.

Gündüz T, Öner S, Çınar T, et al. Hekimler euthanasiayı savunuyorlar mı? Adli Tıp Bülteni. 1996;1:82-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.199612138

Bağ B. Hasta Vasiyetnamesi: Ötenazi mi? Yoksa Kendi Kaderini Kendi Belirleme Hakkı mı? Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks. 2013;5:275-289.

Kaplan KJ, Bratman E. Gender, pain, and doctor involvement: high school student attitudes toward doctor-assisted suicide. Omega. 1999;40:27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/YWWN-667G-JC02-Q7KN

Mayda AS, Ozkara E, Corapcioglu F. Attitudes of oncologists toward euthanasia in Turkey. Palliative & supportive care. 2005;3:221-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951505050340

Kaptan G, Dedeli O, Onen L. Turkish Health Professional’s Attitudes Towards Euthanasia. In: Kuře J, ed. Euthanasia – The “Good Death” Controversy in Humans and Animals. Croatia: Intech; 2011:175-188.

Oğuz NY. Pediatrik Ötanazi. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi. Ekim - Aralık 1996;39:767-776.

Tepehan S, Özkara E, Yavuz MF. Yoğun bakım ve diğer birimlerde görev yapan hemşirelerin ötanaziye yaklaşımı. Adli Tıp Dergisi 2011;25:115-123.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-14

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Uysal C, Karaaslan B, Tanrıverdi H, Çelepkolu T, Korkmaz M, Bulut K, et al. Evaluation of Physicians Opinions About Euthanasia According to Their Frequency to Encounter Death. Bull Leg Med. 2014;18(3):100-106. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2013183255