Forthcoming Articles

Evaluation of Sharp Force Injury Cases in Terms Of Life Threatening Danger

Authors

  • EMİR DERKUŞ İZMİR ŞEHİR HASTANESİ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1723

Keywords:

sharp force injuries, life threatening, forensic traumatology, firearm wounds

Abstract

Objective: Sharp tools, which are frequently used in daily life, are widely used in attacks and injuries due to their ease of transportation. For this reason, injuries and deaths due to these tools are frequently observed in forensic medicine practices. The aim of our study was to evaluate sharp force injuries in terms of life-threatening risk and to determine the precautions that can be taken by drawing attention to violent incidents.

 

Methods: Between 01.01.2015 and 31.12.2019, cases who underwent medicolegal evaluation due to sharp force injuries were evaluated in terms of sociodemographic information, injury sites, number of wounds, injury characteristics and severity. The findings were compared with the results of similar studies.

 

Results: 295 cases were evaluated in the study. 92.5% of the cases were male and 7.5% were female, and the most common age range was 21-30 years (31.2%). The thorax was the most commonly injured body region (24.2%). The rate of internal organ injury was 25.8%. In 66.1% of the cases, the injury wasn’t be cured by a simple medical treatment, 6.1% had bone fractures and 34.2% were life-threatening. 

 

Conclusion: Sharp force injuries most frequently affect young adults and cause serious economic and labor losses. The easy availability of these tools and the fact that the law does’nt penalize the possession of knives used in the home, industry, agriculture or in a profession or art increase the incidents of violence. There is a need for stricter legal regulations, especially on the transportation of such tools.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-04

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
DERKUŞ E. Evaluation of Sharp Force Injury Cases in Terms Of Life Threatening Danger. Bull Leg Med. 2025;. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1723