Bias in Scientific Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1611Keywords:
Epidemiology, Scientific research, bias, systematic errorAbstract
The aim of research is to find the “truth” in medicine. The researcher should be aware of the causes and characteristics of conscious and unconscious errors and know how to prevent them in order to reflect the “truth”. The value determined in epidemiological studies is the sum of: 1) Truth, 2) Random error, 3) Systematic error (Bias). In order to declare that the result is correct, errors must be excluded. Errors may arise at several stages in epidemiological research. Systematic errors lead to bias. In controlled studies, systematic errors often cause significant difference of one study group. However, “random error” or the chance factor does not cause bias. Since this type of error causes a deviation in both groups in the same direction, its effect is canceled, however the sensitivity of the results may decrease. Bias may be conscious or unconscious. A conscious bias is an intentional unethical act, made in order to achieve an intended result, ignoring scientific rules. Unconscious bias is due to inexperience of the researchers who do not consider the factors that may affect the results. Various errors may be made during epidemiological measurements. Since errors can never be eliminated, one should aim to minimize errors. Minimizing systematic errors increases the validity, and minimizing random errors increases power and accuracy of the studies. Bias results in incorrect diagnosis and management proposals, and waste of resources in studies that are carried out to diagnose health problems and to develop management strategies.
Downloads
References
Aksakoğlu G. Sağlıkta Araştırma ve Çözümleme, İzmir 2006
Çakır B, Sağlık Araştırmalarında Bias (Yanlılık, Taraf Tutma): Tipleri, Sınıflandırılması, Nedenleri, Önleme Yöntemleri 1-2, Türkiye Klinikleri, J Med Sci. 2005;25:100-110.
Turaman C. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Araştırmacının Epidemiyoloji El Kitabı, Somgür Yayıncılık, Ankara
Alkan H. Bilimsel Yayınlarda Taraf Tutma, Sağlık Bilimlerinde Süreli Yayıncılık. 2008:89-95. https://docplayer.biz.tr/82047-Bilimsel-yayinlardataraf-tutma-hamdi-akan.html
Rosenstock L, Lee LJ. Attacks on science: the risks to evidence-based policy. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(1):14-18. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.1.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.1.14
Gülesen Ö. Çağdaş Epidemiyoloji. Bursa. 1995.
Hayran O. Sağlıkla İlgili Araştırmalarda Karşılaşılan Önemli Hatalar. 2. Ulusal Çevre Hekimliği Kongresi Kitabı Sf: 319-323; 2006
Akdur R. Halk Sağlığı. Ankara. 1998. https://www.recepakdur.com/media/1275/04-akdur-r-ve-ark-halk-sag-lig-i-antip-1998.pdf
Akgül A. Tıbbi Araştırmalarda İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri- SPSS Uygulamaları, Ankara. 2003.
Dunn KM, Jordan K, Lacey RJ, Shapley M, Jinks C. Patterns of consent in epidemiologic research: evidence from over 25,000 responders. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(11):1087-1094. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh141
Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet. 2002;359(9302):248-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07451-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2
Tezcan S. Epidemiyoloji. Tıbbi Araştırmaların Yöntem Bilimi, Ankara; Halk Sağlığı Vakfı Yayını Yayın. 1992;92(2).
Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Kjellström T. Temel Epidemiyoloji, DSÖ: Cenevre. Nobel & Güneş Tıp Kitabevi. 1997. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/36838/9241544465_tur.pdf?sequence=7
Greenberg R.S., Medical Epidemiology. A Lange Medical Book.
Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V, Biyoistatistik, Ankara 2002
Sorias S. Psikiyatri Araştırmalarında Sık Görülen Yöntem Hataları. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 1997;8(4):241–248. http://psikiyatridizini.net/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=2605
Bertan M, Güler Ç. Halk Sağlığı Temel Bilgiler. Ankara. 1995
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Bulletin of Legal Medicine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.