Abstract
When a claim of medical malpractice is encountered, it is an enormous problem to determine the “presence of causation”. The effect of other intervening factors on the resulting undesirable situation creates great difficulty in determining the causation. In these cases, it may be beneficial to apply causation tests prepared with a legal and philosophical perspective. In this paper, the most known and widely used of these tests, the “but for” test, as well as the lesser known and used “substantial factor” test and “INUS/NESS” tests were reviewed from the literature and their use in medical practice errors were explained with cases.
References
Qirjo A. Medical malpractice: the connection between the doctor-patient relationship and the duty of care. 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 21]; Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alessia-Qirjo/publication/352836737_Medical_malpractice_the_connection_between_the_doctor-patient_relationship_and_the_duty_of_care/links/60dc2e0fa6fdccb745f48515/Medical-malpractice-the-connection-between-the-doctor-patient-relationship-and-the-duty-of-care.pdf
Greco L. Character and Causation: Hume’s Philosophy of Action. Philos Q [Internet]. 2021 Dec 6 [cited 2022 Jan 21];72(1):246–8. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/pq/article/72/1/246/6220163
Ferreira Ruiz M, Umerez J. Interactionism, Post-interactionism, and Causal Complexity: Lessons From the Philosophy of Causation. Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 30;12:384.
Kistler M. Physics’ contribution to causation. Kriter [Internet]. 2021 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Jan 21];35(1):21–46. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/krt-2021-0003/html
Özdemir H. Hekimin Hukuki Sorumluluğu. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Derg [Internet]. 2016 Jun 30 [cited 2021 Nov 2];11(1):33–81. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eruhfd/394697
Moore MS. Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics [Internet]. Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics. London, UK: Oxford University Press ; 2009 [cited 2019 May 8]. 1–640 p. Available from: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=tvDb11SowYgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR21&dq=michael+s+moore+causation+&ots=J9-cx8QskQ&sig=gFxTs8VFOSpIzE8qGp4HMwPVM24&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=michael s moore causation&f=false
Stapleton J. Law, causation and common sense. Oxf J Leg Stud [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2019 Apr 29];8(1):111–31. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/oxfjls8&id=117&div=10&collection=journals
Voss HC. Recovery of Damages for Wrongful Death at Common Law, at Civil Law, and in Louisana. Tulane Law Rev [Internet]. 1931 [cited 2019 Apr 29];6. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tulr6&id=237&div=19&collection=journals
Tümer AR. Cerrahi Branşlar Açısından Hukuki Sorumluluklar ve Malpraktis [Internet]. Ankara: Matsis Matbaa; 2013 [cited 2019 May 8]. Available from: https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?hl=tr&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Cerrahi+branşlar+açısından+hukuki+sorumluluklar+ve+malpraktis&btnG=
Tümer AR, Yıldırım MŞ, Koçak S. Difficult Decision on Tyroid Surgery of Expert Witness: Complication or Malpractice. Bull Leg Med [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 May 8];23(2):89–92. Available from: http://www.adlitipbulteni.com/index.php/atb/article/view/1149
Raz J. Responsibility and the negligence standard. Oxf J Leg Stud [Internet]. 2010 Mar 1 [cited 2019 Apr 29];30(1):1–18. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ojls/gqq002
Nodelman U, Allen C, Zalta EN. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy [Internet]. Stanford University; 2002 [cited 2019 May 8]. 380 p. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-law/
Evren ÇC. İdarenin sorumluluğunu etkileyen neden olarak mücbir sebep. Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Derg [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 Nov 2];14(1):263–97. Available from: https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TVRBeU16ZzFOUT09/idarenin-sorumlulugunu-etkileyen-neden-olarak-mucbir-sebep
Eren F. Sorumluluk Hukuku Açısından Uygun İlliyet Bağı Teorisi [Internet]. Ankara: Ankara Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, Sevinç Matbaası; 1975 [cited 2021 Nov 2]. Available from: https://dspace.ankara.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12575/11673/Sorumluluk Hukuku Açısından Uygun İlliyet Bağı Teorisi.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Karakuş R. Neden Üzerine Düşünme. Beytulhikme An Int J Philos. 2011;1(1):1–16.
Bavli HJ. Causation in Civil Rights Legislation. SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2021 Jan 15 [cited 2022 Jan 21]; Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3784038
Merhacı SÖ. Haksız Fiiller Hukukuna Genel Bir Bakış ve İhmale Dayanan Haksız Fiiller. Ankara Barosu Derg [Internet]. 2012 Jul 1 [cited 2021 Nov 2];(4). Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/abd/374344
David H, McCague WP, Yaniszewski PF. Proving Causation Where the but for Test Is Unworkable. Advocates’ Q [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2021 Nov 2];30. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/aqrty30&id=272&div=&collection=
Lester RC. The Substantial Factor Test for Causation; Juedeman v. Montana Deaconess Medical Center. Mont Law Rev [Internet]. 1987 [cited 2021 Nov 2];48. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/montlr48&id=397&div=&collection=
Wright RW. Causation in Tort Law. Calif Law Rev [Internet]. 1985 [cited 2021 Nov 2];73. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/calr73&id=1749&div=&collection=
Mackie JL. Causes and Conditions. Am Philos Q [Internet]. 1965 Oct [cited 2021 Nov 2];2(4):245–64. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009173?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Moore MS. Causation in the Law (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Nov 2]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-law/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 The Bulletin of Legal Medicine