Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to draw attention to the importance of the effect on a forensic report of trauma-related mental health effects and their frequency revealed in psychiatric consultation requested by the Forensic Medicine Polyclinic for cases exposed to different kinds of trauma.
Methods: A retrospective examination was made of 192 cases consulted by the Psychiatry Department for a report requested by the judicial authorities between June 2016 and September 2019. Psychiatric evaluation was made by psychiatry specialists according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V-TR (DSM-V-TR).
Results: Evaluation was made of 192 cases comprising 54 (28.1%) males and 138 (71.9%) females with a mean age of 39.44±13.84 years. In 164 (85.4%) cases, the diagnostic criteria of a psychiatric disorder according to DSM-V-TR were met. Of these, although the physical effects of the trauma in 147 (89.6%) cases were classified as “of a nature which can be eliminated with a simple medical intervention”, the injuries of the mental effects were determined as “of a nature which cannot be eliminated with a simple medical intervention”. When the relationship between the event and gender was examined, 76.6% (n:118) of assault crimes were determined to have been perpetrated against females (p>0.005).
Conclusion: In this study, findings of mental trauma were revealed, and consequently, the effect on the forensic report was determined. A multidisciplinary approach to trauma cases will provide more robust judicial management.
References
Dokgöz H, Koçak U. Adli Bilimler. İçinde: Dokgöz H Editör, Adli Tıp & Adli Bilimler. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2019. s. 1-30.
Dokgöz H. Bilirkişilik. İçinde: Dokgöz H Editör, Adli Tıp & Adli Bilimler. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2019. s. 31-50.
Akbaba M, Isır AB, Karaarslan B, Dülger HE. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalında Düzenlenmiş Adli Raporların Değerlendirilmesi (2005-2011). Bull Leg Med. 2012;17(2):10-18. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.201217226.
Kar H, Dokgöz H. Adli Rapor. İçinde: Dokgöz H Editör, Adli Tıp & Adli Bilimler. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2019. s. 359-378.
Balcı Y, Çolak B, Gürpınar K, Anolay NN. Türk Ceza Kanunu’nda Tanımlanan Yaralama Suçlarının Adli Tıp Açısından Değerlendirilmesi Rehberi, 2019.
Şener MT, Kök AN. Consultation in The Practice of Forensic Medicine. Bull Leg Med. 2011;16(3):77-80. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2011163729
Can İÖ, Uyanıker ZD, Ulaş H, Karabağ G, Cimilli C, Salaçin S. Mental Findings in Trauma Victims. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi. 2013; 50: 230-236.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
Karakaya I, Çolak B. Posttraumatic Stres Disorder in Children and Adolescents and Evaluation in Forensic Medicine. Bull Leg Med. 2007;12(2):82-87. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2007122642.
Öncü F, Sercan M. Ceza Hukukunda Adli Psikiyatri. Sercan M editör, Adli Psikiyatri Uygulama Kılavuzu, 1. Baskı, Ankara, Türk Psikiyatri Derneği Yayınları; 2007. s. 33-50.
Saygılı Ç, Ak S, Cantürk G. What Is The Level of Forensic Psychiatry Knowledge Among Psychiatrists in Turkey? "In Your Opinion, Should Forensic Psychiatry Be a Sub-specialty?" Bull Leg Med. 2019; 24 (1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2019149810.
Bryant RA, O'donnell ML, Creamer M, McFarlane AC, Clark CR, Silove D. The psychiatric sequelae of traumatic injury. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:312–20. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09050617.
O'Donnell ML, Alkemade N, Creamer MC, et al. The long-term psychiatric sequelae of severe injury: a 6-year follow-up study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(4):e473-e479. doi:10.4088/JCP.14m09721.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 The Bulletin of Legal Medicine