Radioisotope Analyses in Determination of Time since Death from Skeletal Remains

Authors

  • Özge Ünlütürk Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı, Kemik ve Diş İncelemeleri Şubesi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2016323752

Keywords:

time since death, radioisotope analysis, nuclear testing, Sr90, Pb210

Abstract

Estimation of the time since death is one of the most important problems in forensic cases. It is relatively easier to estimate the time since death in such cases if the corpse is fresh or the soft tissue still exists. However, estimating postmortem interval becomes more complicated as decomposition stage of the corpse develops. While evaluating decomposition stages of a corpse, different criteria like environmental conditions, position of the body and bodily features should be studied all together. Estimation of the time since death is carried out macroscopically in the first place according to morphological changes. Nevertheless, various histological, chemical and psychical methods can be used as well to estimate the time since death particularly if long time passes after death and skeletonization begins. Of all these methods, radioisotope analyses are the most discussed method since it is not affected by environmental factors. Because of their short half-lives, the analyses especially carried out with measurement of Sr90and Pb210radionuclides have produced successful results in estimating postmortem intervals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cardoso HF, Santos A, Dias R, Garcia C, Pinto M, Sérgio C et al. Establishing a minimum postmortem interval of human remains in an advanced state of skeletonization using the growth rate of bryophyte sand plant roots. Int J Legal Med 2010;124(5):451-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0372-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0372-5

Rodríguez-Martín C, Bass WM. Decomposition of buried bodies and methods that may aid in their location. J Forensic Sci 1985;30(3):836-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS11017J

Mann RW, Bass WM, Meadows L. Time since death and decomposition of the human body: Variables and observations in case and experimental field studies. J Forensic Sci 1990;35(1):103-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS12806J

Galloway A, Snodgrass JJ. Biological and chemical hazards of forensic skeletal analysis. J Forensic Sci 1998;43(5):940-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14338J

Komar DA. Decayrates in a cold climate region: A review of cases involving advanced decomposition from the Medical Examiner's Office in Edmonton, Alberta. J Forensic Sci 1998;43(1):57-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS16090J

Aturaliya S, Lukasewycz A. Experimental forensic and bio anthropological aspects of soft tissue taphonomy: 1. Factors influencing postmortem tissue desiccation rate. J Forensic Sci 1999;44(5):893-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS12011J

Pickering R, Bachman D. The Use of Forensic Anthropology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc., 2009.

Wieberg DA, Wescott DJ. Estimating the timing of long bone fractures: Correlation between the postmortem interval, bone moisture content, and blunt force trauma fracture characteristics. J Forensic Sci 2008;53(5):1028-34 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00801.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00801.x

Komar D, Beattie O. Postmortem insect activity may mimic perimortem sexual assault clothing patterns. J Forensic Sci 1998;43(4):792-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14308J

Voss SC, Forbes SL, Dadour IR. Decomposition and insect succession on cadavers inside a vehicle environment. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4(1):22-32 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-007-0028-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-007-0028-z

Rodríguez-Martín C, Bass WM. Insect activity and its relationship to decay rates of human cadavers in East Tennessee. J Forensic Sci 1983;28(2):423-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS11524J

Willey P, Heilman A. Estimating time since death using plant roots and stems. J Forensic Sci 1987;32(5):1264-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS11177J

Yoshino M, Kimijima T, Miyasaka S, Sato H, Seta S. Microscopical study on estimation of time since death in skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int 1991;49(2):143-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(91)90074-S

Maclaughlin-Black SM, Herd RJ, Willson K, Myers M, West IE. Strontium-90 as an indicator of time since death: A pilot investigation. Forensic Sci Int 1992;57(1):51-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(92)90045-X

Swift B. Dating human skeletal remains: Investigating the viability of measuring the equilibrium between 210Po and 210Pb as a means of estimating the post-mortem interval. Forensic Sci Int 1998;98(1-2):119-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-1131(99)90081-0

Neis P, Hille R, Paschke M, Pilwat G, Schnabel A, Niess C et al. Strontium90 for determination of time since death. Forensic Sci Int 1999;99(1):47-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00175-3

Introna FJ, Di Vella G, Campobasso CP. Determination of postmortem interval from old skeletal remains by image analysis of luminol test results. J Forensic Sci 1999;44(3):535-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14505J

Swift B, Lauder I, Black S, Norris J. An estimation of the post-mortem interval in human skeletal remains: A radionuclide and trace element approach. Forensic Sci Int 2001;117(1-2):73-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00451-5

Ubelaker DH, Buchholz BA, Stewart JE. Analysis of artificial radiocarbon in different skeletal and dental tissue types to evaluate date of death. J Forensic Sci 2006;51(3):484-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00125.x

Ramsthaler F, Kreutz K, Zipp K, Verhoff MA. Dating skeletal remains with luminol-chemiluminescence. Validity, intra- and inter observer error. Forensic Sci Int 2009;187(1-3):47-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.02.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.02.015

Schwarcz HP, Agur K, Jantz LM. A new method for determination of postmortem interval: Citrate content of bone. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1516-22 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01511.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01511.x

Ramsthaler F, Ebach SC, Birngruber CG, Verhoff MA. Postmortem interval of skeletal remains through the detection of intra ossealhemin traces. A comparison of UV-fluorescence, luminol, Hexagon-OBTI®, and Combur® tests. Forensic Sci Int 2011;209(1-3):59-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.12.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.12.011

Schrag B, Uldin T, Mangin P, Froidevaux P. Dating human skeletal remains using a radiometric method: Biogenic versus diagenetic 90Sr and 210Pb in vertebrae. Forensic Sci Int 2012;220(1-3):271-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.014

Swift B. The timing of death. In: Rutty GN, editor. Essentials of Autopsy Practice: Current Method sand Modern Trends. London: Springer, 2006. p 189-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-026-5_8

Ziad N, Zarki R, Benmansour M, Sayerh T, Laissaoui A. Determination of 210Pb in human skeletal remains from Morocco: Implications for time since death assessment. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2012;292(1):315-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1416-0

Downloads

Published

2016-12-29

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

1.
Ünlütürk Özge. Radioisotope Analyses in Determination of Time since Death from Skeletal Remains. Bull Leg Med. 2016;21(3):177-182. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2016323752