Determination of Gender From Facial Angels
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Original Research
    P: 122-128
    August 2022

    Determination of Gender From Facial Angels

    The Bulletin of Legal Medicine 2022;27(2):122-128
    1. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 24.06.2021
    Accepted Date: 02.08.2021
    Publish Date: 01.08.2022
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    Linear and angular measurements can be taken on the human body, especially from anthropometric points in the face area. There are measurement studies using different techniques on different ethnic origins in many countries, aimed at revealing the differences between the genders, from the determined anthropometric points for the eye, nose, lips, and mouth contours, which form the main lines of the face. In this study, we aimed to determine the role of facial angles in gender prediction, which is less common in the literature.

    Methods:

    In this study, 126 male and 121 female volunteers aged between 18-25 participated. Lateral photogrammetric images of all participants were taken in a natural head position, mouth in normal position, upper and lower lips closed to contact, and all images were transferred to the computer environment. Six anthropometric points determined in the vertical plane and three angles between these points were measured by the same researcher on all photographs. The results of the measurements were compared according to gender, and 10% of all measurements were repeated twice.

    Results:

    The nasofrontal angle was found to be statistically significantly larger in women than in men (p=0,000). In this context, the differential diagnosis reliability of the nasofrontal angle was found to be very strong. While statistically no significant difference was found between nasolabial angle values, a statistically significant difference was found between genders in terms of mentolabial angle values (p=0,022). The mentolabial angle was significantly larger in women and the differential diagnosis reliability was determined as strong.

    Conclusion:

    Nasofrontal and mentolabial angles can be used safely in gender determination. Knowing the difference of nasofrontal, nasolabial and mentolabial angles between ethnic groups is important for obtaining optimum results from facial surgery. We think that the results obtained in our study will contribute to departments such as anatomy, psychiatry, human resources departments, information technology, forensic medicine, which are interested in facial analysis.

    Keywords: Gender determination, photogrammetric analysis, nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, mentolabial angle

    References

    1
    Özdemir F. Yüzün antropometrik ölçümlerinin kullanım alanları. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018;11(2):1080-1091. doi: 10.17218/hititsosbil.463932
    2
    Shams N, Razavi M, Mehrabi A, Salehin S, Sarikhani P. Determining gender and age by mandibular anatomy landmarks in computed tomography with cone-beam (CBCT). Journal of Molecular Biology Research. 2019;9(1):33-40. doi: 10.5539/jmbr.v9n1p33
    3
    Leversha J, McKeough G, Myrteza A, Skjellrup-Wakefiled H, Welsh J, Sholapurkar A. Age and gender correlation of gonialangle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(1):49-54. doi: 10.4317/jced.52683
    4
    Gupta A, Kumar K, Shetty DC, Wadhwan V, Jain A, Khannaet KS. Stature and gender determination and their correlation using odontometry and skull anthropometry. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014;6(2):101-106. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.132536
    5
    Samal A, Subramani V, Marx D. An analysis of sexual dimorphism in the human face. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation. 2007;18(6):453-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2007.04.010
    6
    Karaca Bozdağ Z, Kürkçüoğlu A, Üstdal Güney A, Cam Y, Oğuz O. An assessment of gender difference in visual cephalometric analysis applied to class individuals: a preliminary study. East J Med. 2019;24(1):1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2019.40570
    7
    Adamu LH, Ojo SA, Danborno B, Adebisi SS, Taura MG. Sex determination using facial linear dimensions and angles among Hausa population of Kano State, Nigeria. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2016;6(4):459-467. doi: 10.1016/j.ejfs.2016.11.006
    8
    Özkoçak V, Özdemir F. Anadolu erkeklerine ait yüz ölçümleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. ASEAD. 2017;11(4):176-186. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/asead/issue/52677/694359
    9
    Hızlı Ö, Baki GE, Özcan KM. Doğu Karadeniz bölgesinde yaşayan insanların nazal antropometrik değerlerinin paranazal bilgisayarlı tomografi ile incelenmesi. Kocaeli Med J. 2018;7(1):42-46. https://docplayer.biz.tr/108768466-Kocaeli-med-j-2018-7-1-42-46-arastirma-makalesi-original-article-abstract-omer-hizli-1-gaye-ecin-baki-2-kursat-murat-ozcan-3.html
    10
    Ferdousi MA, Al Mamun A, Banu LA, Paul S. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the facial profile of the adult Bangladeshi Garo. Advances in Anthropology. 2013;3(4):188-192. doi: 10.4236/aa.2013.34026
    11
    Malkoç S, Demir A, Uysal T, Canbuldu N. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:174-179. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn082
    12
    Halberstein RA. The application of anthropometric ındices in forensic photography: Three case studies. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(6):1438-1441.
    13
    Hancock, PJ, Bruce V, Burton, MA. A comparison of two computer-based face identification systems with human perceptions of faces. Vision Res. 1998;38(15-16):2277-2288. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00439-2
    14
    Budai M, Farkas L, Tompson B, Katic M, Forrest C. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(2):154-161. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200303000-00004
    15
    Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Ciusa V, Dellavia C. Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: a computerized three-dimensional mesh diagram analysis. Clin Anat. 2003;16:420-443. doi: 10.1002/ca.10154
    16
    Siddapur KR, Siddapur GK. Morphometric analytical study of external nose angulations using photographic technique. IJMTFM. 2017;7(3):165-170. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijmtfm.v7i3(Summer).17043
    17
    Rajkumar C, Daniel MJ, Srinivasan SV, Jimsha VK. Gender prediction from digital lateral cephalogram-a preliminary study. Annals of Dental Specialty. 2017;5(2):48-51. gender-prediction-from-digital-lateral-cephalogram-a-preliminary-study.pdf (annalsofdentalspecialty.net.in)
    18
    Gode S, Tiris FS, Akyildiz S, Apaydin F. Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in Turkish rhinoplasty population. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35(6):1016-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9726-8
    19
    Gürses E, Yağcı A. Cephalometric and photographical evaluation of different nasolabial measurement methods. Journal of Health Sciences. 2017;26:105-111. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/693841
    20
    Tuncel U, Turan A, Kostakoğlu N. Digital anthropometric shape analysis of 110 rhinoplasty patients in the black sea region in Turkey. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41:98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.014
    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House