ABSTRACT

Objective:

Illegal organ transplantations are attempted from time to time by issuing fake IDs or using someone else’s identity to receive transplantation as soon as possible by bypassing the organ waiting list. In recent years, it has been requested by the Court of Cassation that the people who were alleged to have purchased organs be evaluated in terms of Turkish Penal Code (TPC) 25/2. This study aims to discuss the method of approach to these cases.

Methods:

The forensic reports prepared by the Department of Forensic Medicine of Akdeniz University Hospital between 01.01.2019 and 31.12.2021 were examined, and the cases that were sent by judicial authorities to be evaluated in terms of TPC 25/2 were included in the study.

Results:

A total of nine cases were identified. It was understood that five of these cases used fake IDs, as well as, in six cases the illegal transplants were identified after the completion of the transplantations.

Conclusion:

TPC Article 25/2 states that, in case of necessity, the person does not have any criminal responsibility regarding the behaviors they do to protect against a serious and certain danger which was directed at a right to which they, or another, were entitled where there are no other means of protection. Although end-stage renal disease is an important public health problem, there are treatment alternatives for patients with end-stage renal disease. As a result, it was concluded that these cases did not have a medical emergency that prevented hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis before transplantation.

Keywords: Organ transplantation, organ donation, organ trafficking, Forensic Medicine

References

Starzl TE. Landmark perspective: The landmark identical twin case. JAMA. 1984;251(19):2572-2573. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1984.03340430070036

Türkiye Biyoetik Derneği Organ Nakli ve Etik İlkeler Raporu. 2012.nhttps://biyoetik.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/TBD_OrganNakli_Raporuu.pdf

Shimazono Y. The state of the international organ trade: A provisional picture based on integration of available information. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(12):955-962. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.06.039370

Süren ÖK. Organ ve doku naklinin yasal ve etik açıdan incelenmesi. TBB Dergisi. 2007;73:175-195. http://tbbdergisi.barobirlik.org.tr/m2007-73-374

Huang S, Tang Y, Zhu Z, Yang J, Zhang Z, Wang L, et al. Outcomes of Organ Transplantation from Donors with a Cancer History. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:997-1007. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909059

Veroux M, Ardita V, Corona D, Giaquinta A, Ekser B, Sinagra N, et al. Kidney Transplantation From Donors with Hepatitis B. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:1427-1434. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.896048

International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation [Internet]. IRODaT Newsletter 2021. 2021. https://www.irodat.org/img/database/pdf/Irodat%20December_final%202020.pdf

Yücetin L, Keçecioğlu N, Ersoy FF. Türkiye’de Organ Bağışı Ve Nakline Bir Bakış. Diyaliz Transplantasyon ve Yanık. 2003;14(2):115-118. http://www.dty.org.tr/forms/contentshow.php?journal_no=26&page_number=115&article_number=5&tip=METIN

Altınanahtar A. Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de organ tedariki ve nakli: İktisadi perspektifler, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Sosyoekonomi. 2016;24(28):11-30. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.77392

Yaman S, Çağatay H. Organ Ticaretinin Etik ve Pratik Sonucu. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim. 2020;15(34):373-402. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/msydergi/issue/60642/886574

Vural A, Cantürk G. Türk Hukukunda Organ ve Doku Nakli. In: Erkol Z, Doğramacı Y, editors. Tıp Hukuku. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2019. p. 62-71.https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/bitstream/handle/20.500.12812/73594/yokAcikBilim_10143784.pdf?sequence=-1&isAllowed=y

Larijani B, Zahedi F, Taheri E. Ethical and legal aspects of organ transplantation in Iran. Transplant Proc. 2004;36(5):1241-1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.05.065

Griffin A. Kidneys on demand. BMJ. 2007;334(7592):502-505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39141.493148.94

Major RW. Paying kidney donors: time to follow Iran? Mcgill J Med. 2008;11(1):67-69. https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v11i1.408

Joralemon D. Shifting ethics: debating the incentive question in organ transplantation. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(1):30-35. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.27.1.30

Denise SH. Regulating the sale of human organs. Va Law Rev. 1985;71(6):1015-1038. https://doi.org/10.2307/1072918

Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Matas AJ, Ellison MD, Gill JS, Kausz AT. Preemptive kidney transplantation: the advantage and the advantaged. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(5):1358-1364. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASN.0000013295.11876.C9

Murdeshwar HN, Anjum F. Hemodialysis. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island FL; USA. 2022.

Abdel-Kader K, Unruh ML, Weisbord SD. Symptom burden, depression, and quality of life in chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(6):1057-1064. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00430109

Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Jha V, Neal B, Patrice HM, Okpechi I, et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1975-1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61601-9.

Evaluation of Legal Violations in Organ Transplantations According to Turkish Penal Code Article 25/2

ABSTRACT

References