ABSTRACT

Objective

This study examines cases of violence victims who applied to the newly established Forensic Medicine Polyclinic in the first nine months. It aims to discuss the sociodemographic, medical, and judicial characteristics and explore what experts can do to prevent violence, a serious public health issue, and establish justice more effectively.

Methods

The forensic reports of violence victims who sought treatment at the Forensic Medicine unit, where the study was conducted, between September 22, 2022, the day of its establishment, and June 22, 2023, as outpatients under law enforcement supervision, were retrospectively examined. Statistical analysis was conducted by evaluating the type of violence, age, gender, application time, findings, consultations, and outcomes.

Results

Out of 172 victims, 58.7% were male, 41.3% were female, and 89% were aged 18-65. 63% were brought for examination by law enforcement, with physical violence detected in 97.6%. Sixty-four percent of cases were examined within the first 3 hours, 74.4% had treatable wounds, and women were often attacked at home by their spouses and lovers. Men faced violence from acquaintances in open spaces and workplaces, with cases frequently referred to the psychiatric clinic.

Conclusion

Factors such as demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, age), type and duration of violence, and hospitalization are very important in assessing violent incidents. This data helps prevent violence and provide appropriate support and treatment to victims. Collaboration with forensic medicine experts and other branches is useful in forensic case management, especially in emergency departments.

References

1Güven KFM, Bütün C, Beyaztaş YF, Eren ŞH, Korkmaz İ. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi’ne Başvuran Adli Olguların Değerlendirilmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;10(3):23-28.

2Adli Tıp Uzmanları Derneği, Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı, Adli Tıp Derneği. Türk Ceza Kanunu’nda Tanımlanan Yaralama Suçlarının Adli Tıp Açısından Değerlendirilmesi Rehberi. 2019.

3Karbeyaz K, Gündüz T, Balcı Y. Yeni Türk Ceza Kanunu Çerçevesinde Kemik Kırıklarına Adli Tıbbi Yaklaşım. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2010;16(5):453-458.

4Çeliksöz AH, Emiral E, Doğan B, Şimşek Ü, Karbeyaz K. Adli Nitelikli Olgularda Kemik Kırıklarının Değerlendirilmesi. J For Med. 2020;34(3):134-140.https://doi.org/10.5505/adlitip.2020.19327

5Bilgin NG, Dokgöz H, Kar H. Eski ve Yeni Türk Ceza Yasasına Göre Düzenlenen Adli Raporların Karşılaştırılması. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2006;11(2):64-70.https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2006112609

6Bilgin GN, Canbaz H, Mert E. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Acil Servisine Başvuran Adli Olguların Özellikleri. Adli Bilimler Dergisi. 2004;3(4):37-44.

7Sehlikoğlu K, Aslan MC. Adıyaman Adli Tıp Şube Müdürlüğü’nde Düzenlenen Adli Travmatolojiyi İlgilendiren Raporların Değerlendirilmesi. J For Med. 2022;36(3):109-118.

8Lewis SJ, Arseneault L, Caspi A, Fisher HL, Matthews T, Moffitt TE, et al. The Epidemiology of Trauma and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder In a Representative Cohort of Young People in England and Wales. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(3):247-256.https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2215-0366(19)30031-8

9Hazra D, Nekkanti, AC, Prabhakar Abhilash KP. Injury Pattern and Outcome of Assault Victims: An Emergency Department Perspective. Arch Trauma Res. 2020;9:154-159.https://doi.org/10.4103/atr.atr_47_20

10Aslan F, Ergönen A, Beden O, Bulgur D, Özkan Ö. Ülkemizde Adli Tıp Uzmanlarının Çalışma Koşulları ve Mesleki Uygulamalar Konusundaki Görüşleri-Anket Çalışması. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2023;28(1):55-65.https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1624

11Ketenci HÇ, Kır MZ, Başbulut AZ, Beyhun NE. Erzurum Adli Tıp Şube Müdürlüğüne Müracaat Eden Olguların Değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Dergisi. 2012;27(2):87-93.https://doi.org/10.5505/adlitip.2013.99609

12Aksu H, Karakoç Demirkaya S, Gürbüz Özgür B, Gün B. Aydın İlinde Bir Yıldaki Çocuk ve Ergen Adli Olguların Değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2013;14:369-77.https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.43501

13Göçeoğlu ÜÜ, Balcı Y, Erbaş M, Demir ES, Kadı G. Evaluation of Young People of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital Outpatient Clinic of Forensic Medicine. Medical Journal of Mugla Sitki Kocman University. 2019;6(3):129-134.

14World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Medicolegal Care for Victims Sexual Violance, Geneva, 2003.

15Akbaba M, Isır AB, Karaarslan B, Dülger HE. Evaluation of the Forensic Reports Documented at the Department of Forensic Medicine of Gaziantep University (2005-2011). The Bulletin of Legal Medicine. 2012;17(2):10-18.https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.201217226

16Sehlikoglu K, Kafadar H. Assessing of the Forensic Reports Documented by Forensic Medicine Polyclinic of Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital in 2017-2018. Ann Med Res. 2021;28(8):1483-1489.https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.09.932

17Çakır G, Şenol E. Assessing the Forensic Reports Documented by Forensic Medicine Polyclinic of Karşıyaka State Hospital in 2015. Anatol J Med. 2017;27(2):114-120.https://doi.org/10.5222/terh.2017.114

18Köksal Ö, Özdemir F, Bulut M, Eren Ş. Analysis of Patients With Stabbing Injuries Who Applied to Emergency Deparültment of Uludag University Hospital. J Uludag University Faculty of Med, 2009;35(2):63-67.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uutfd/issue/35279/391468

19Ertekin A. Analysis of Patients Admitted to the Emergency department With Gunshot Wounds. J Surg Med. 2021;5(5):482-485.https://doi. org/10.28982/josam.899384

Evaluation of Violence Cases Applying to A Newly Established Forensic Medicine Polyclinic

ABSTRACT

References