Evaluation of University Students’ Cyber Security Awareness and Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimization Levels in the COVID-19 Pandemic
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Original Research
    P: 142-149
    August 2022

    Evaluation of University Students’ Cyber Security Awareness and Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimization Levels in the COVID-19 Pandemic

    The Bulletin of Legal Medicine 2022;27(2):142-149
    1. Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Adli Bilimler Bölümü, Kütahya, Türkiye
    2. Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı, Kütahya, Türkiye
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 13.07.2021
    Accepted Date: 10.11.2021
    Publish Date: 01.08.2022
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    It is important for young people to recognize the concept of cyberbullying and gain coping skills so that they can fight against cyberbullying/victimization. The aim of this study is to determine the cyberbullying and cyber victimization levels and cyber security awareness of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Methods:

    The universe of the cross-sectional study consists of Kutahya Health Sciences University Vocational School students. The questionnaire forms prepared online were answered by 823 students. Survey form includes; the personal data form containing sociodemographic data, questions to measure the level of possession and usage features of information communication tools about cyber security awareness, and cyberbullying scale (CBS) and cyber victimization scale (CVS). The data analyses were performed using Mann Whitney-U test, Kruskal Wallis test and Spearman correlation.

    Results:

    3.2% (n=26) of the students reported that they were cyberbullying and 35.1% (n=289) of the students reported that they were cybervictimized. The median values of CBS and CVS scores were detected as; 1.5 [minimum (min): 0- maximum (max): 14] and 9 (min: 0-max: 30), respectively. The CVS score was found to be higher in those over the age of 22, in female students, in those who use the Internet for more than 5 hours a day besides online classes, and in students who increased the amount of cigarette/alcohol use in the last year (p<0.05). No statistically significant correlation was found between the CBS score and some characteristics of the students (p>0.05).

    Conclusion:

    While the frequency of cyberbullying and the scale score were very low among the students, it was found that 3 out of 10 students experienced cyber victimization and the scale score was not very high. However, the identification of risk groups exposed to cyber victimization is important in terms of developing future intervention programs and taking measures at the regional level.

    Keywords: Information and communication technologies, university students, cyber security, cybervictimization, cyberbullying

    References

    1
    Dubey MJ, Ghosh R, Chatterjee S, Biswas P, Chatterjee S, Dubey S. COVID-19 and addiction. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2020 Sep 1;14(5):817-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.008
    2
    Gökler ME, Turan Ş. COVID-19 Pandemisi Sürecinde Teknoloji Kullanımı Önerileri. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Halk Sağlığı Dergisi. 2020;5:108-114. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.767526
    3
    Arıcak OT, Tanrikulu T, Kinay H. Siber Mağduriyet Ölçeği’nin İlk Psikometrik Bulguları. Mediterranean J of Edu. Research. 2012;11:1-6.
    4
    Aslan T. Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kaygılarının sosyal medya bağımlılıklarını yordayıcı rolünün incelenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü; 2020
    5
    Statista (Internet). Media usage during COVID-19 by country Statista. 2020 (cited 2021 Jun 18). Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1106498/home-media-consumption-coronavirus-worldwide-by-country/
    6
    Arıcak OT. Siber zorbalık: Gençlerimizi bekleyen yeni tehlike. Kariyer Penceresi. 2011;2(6):10-12.
    7
    Arıcak OT. Psychiatric Symptomatology as a Predictor of Cyberbullying among University Students. Eurasian J of Edu Research. 2009;34(9):167-184.
    8
    Arıcak T, Siyahhan S, Uzunhasanoğlu A, Saribeyoğlu S, Çıplak S, Yılmaz N, et al. Cyberbullying Among Turkish Adolescents. Cyber Psychology Behav. 2008;11(3):253-261. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0016
    9
    Erdur-Baker Ö. Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Soc. 2010;12(1):109-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341260
    10
    Schneider SK, O’donnell L, Stueve A, Coulter RWS. Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(1):171-177. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300308
    11
    Davis RA. Cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput Human Behav. 2001;17(2):187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8
    12
    Yang SC, Tung CJ. Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Comput Human Behav. 2007;23(1):79-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.037
    13
    Eroğlu Y. Ergenlerde Siber Zorbalık Ve Mağduriyeti Yordayan Risk Etmenlerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bütüncül Bir Model Önerisi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Uludağ Üniversitesi; 2014.
    14
    Huang YY, Chou C. An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(6):1581-1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005
    15
    Pereira F, Spitzberg BH, Matos M. Cyber-harassment victimization in Portugal: Prevalence, fear and help-seeking among adolescents. Comput Human Behav. 2016;62:136-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.039
    16
    Rader E, Wash R. Identifying patterns in informal sources of security information n.d. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyv008.
    17
    Lam LT, Li Y. The validation of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) for adolescents. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(1):3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.021
    18
    Gençdoğan B, Çikrıkci Ö. E- Zorbalık Ölçeği ve E-Mağduriyet Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formlarının Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama. 2014;11(1):359-373.
    19
    Çetin E, Cantürk NRD. E-Zorbalık Ölçeği ve E-Mağduriyet Ölçeği: Ankara Üniversitesi Sigara Bağımlısı Öğrencilerinde Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2019;24(2):115-121. doi 10.17986/blm.2019252290
    20
    Ayas T. Exploring the Teachers’ Cyber Bullying Perception in terms of Various Variables. International Online J of Edu. Sciences.2011;3(2):619-640
    21
    Sun Y, Li Y, Bao Y, Meng S, Sun Y, Schumann G, et al. Brief Report: Increased Addictive Internet and Substance Use Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. Am J Addict. 2020;29(4):268-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.13066
    22
    Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Corwin Press. 2014.
    23
    Kokkinos CM, Antoniadou N, Markos A. Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. J of Applied Development Psychol. 2014;35(3):204-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.04.001
    24
    Balakrishnan V. Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: The roles of gender, age and Internet frequency. Comput Human Behav. 2015;46:149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.021
    25
    Livingstone S, Haddon L, Gorzig A. Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective. Bristol Policy Press. 2012.
    26
    Nartgun ŞS, Uylas SD, Yerlikaya S. Analyzing The Relationship Between Cyberbullying Sensibility and Cyber Victimization Levels of High School Students. Int J Educ Res Rev. 2016;1(2):1-1. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.309961
    27
    Çömlekçi MF, Başol O. Gençlerin Sosyal Medya Kullanım Amaçları ile Sosyal Medya Bağımlılığı İlişkisinin İncelenmesi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sos Bilim Derg. 2019;17(4):173-188. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.525652
    28
    Myers CA, Cowie H. Cyberbullying across the lifespan of education: Issues and interventions from school to university. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(7):1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071217
    29
    Arafa AE, Senosy SA. Pattern and correlates of cyberbullying victimization among Egyptian university students in beni-suef, Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2017;92(2):107-115. doi: 10.21608/EPX.2018.8948
    30
    Akbaba S, Eroğlu Y. İlköğretim Öğrencilerinde Siber Zorbalık ve Mağduriyetin Yordayıcıları. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğt Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013;26(1):105-122.
    31
    Guo S. A meta-analysis of the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Psychol Sch. 2016;53(4):432-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21914
    32
    Wolak J, Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D. Does Online Harassment Constitute Bullying? An Exploration of Online Harassment by Known Peers and Online-Only Contacts. J Adolesc Heal. 2007;41(6):51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.019
    33
    Sabır E. Siber Zorbalık ve Siber Mağduriyetin Sosyal Uyuma ve Bazı Demografik Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. PAU J Educ. 2020;49:190-222. doi: 10.9779/pauefd.559831
    34
    Kağan M, Ciminli A. Ergenlerde Sanal Zorbalık ve Mağduriyetin Cinsiyet, Sınıf, Okul Değişkenleri ve Kişilik Özellikleriyle İlişkisinin İncelenmesi. Online J of Technology Addiction & Cyberbullying. 2016;3(2):14-34
    35
    Akcan G. The Investigation of Predictors of Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimization in University Students. Foresic Res Criminol Int J. 2017;4(5).
    36
    Topçu Ç, Erdur-Baker Ö, Çapa-Aydin Y. Examination of cyberbullying experiences among Turkish students from different school types. Cyberpsychology Behav. 2008;11(6):643-648. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0161
    37
    Williams KR, Guerra NG. Prevalence and Predictors of Internet Bullying. J Adolesc Heal. 2007;41(6):14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018
    38
    Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2004;45(7):1308-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x
    39
    Dursun S, Gökçe A, Aytaç S. Cyber Bullyıng: A Research on Unıversıty Students. Int J Soc Inq. 2020;2(2020):465-485.https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-3340.
    40
    Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J, Cutts H. High School Students’ Perceptions of Coping With Cyberbullying. Youth Soc. 2012;44(2):284-306. doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11398881
    41
    Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J. “The internet is a mask”: High school students’ suggestions for preventing cyberbullying. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(5):587-592. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.4.20725
    42
    Burnukara P. İlk ve Orta Ergenlikte Geleneksel ve Sanal Akran Zorbalığına İlişkin Betimsel Bir İnceleme (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi; 2009.
    43
    Şimşek N, Şahin D, Evli M. Internet Addiction, Cyberbullying, and Victimization Relationship in Adolescents: A Sample from Turkey. J Addict Nurs. 2019;30(3):201-210. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000296
    44
    Eroğlu Y, Aktepe E, Akbaba S, Işik A, Özkorumak E. Siber zorbalik ve mağduriyetin yaygınlığının ve risk faktörlerinin incelenmesi. Egt. ve Bilim. 2015;40(177):93-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.3698
    45
    Wu XS, Zhang ZH, Zhao F, Wang WJ, Li YF, Bi L, et al. Prevalence of Internet addiction and its association with social support and other related factors among adolescents in China. J Adolesc. 2016;52:103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.07.012
    46
    Altundağ Y. Lise Öğrencilerinde Sanal Zorbalık ve Problemli İnternet Kullanımı İlişkisi. Online J Technol Addict Cyberbullying. 2016;3(1):27-43.
    47
    Ünver H, Koç Z. Siber Zorbalık ile Problemli İnternet Kullanımı ve Riskli İnternet Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Türk Eğt Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;15(2):117-140.
    48
    Li Q. Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation. Australas J Educ Technol. 2007;23(4):435-454. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1245
    49
    Akca E, Sayımer I, Başak B, Sali J. Okulda Siber Zorbalığın Nedenleri, Türleri Ve Medya Okuryazarlığı Eğitiminin Önleyici Çalışmalardaki Yeri. Elektron Mesleki Gelişim ve Araştırmalar Der. 2014;2(2):17-30
    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House