ABSTRACT
Objective:
The use of sexually explicit correspondence and images for sexual threats has become widespread today with the increasing use of social media platforms. In our study, it is aimed to retrospectively examine the victims of online sexual violence, to discuss them in the light of the literature and to draw attention to the potential risks of social media use.
Methods:
The sociodemographic characteristics, social media platforms and types of online violence of the victims, their families and suspects/perpetrators who applied to the Forensic Medicine Clinic between 01.01.2016 and 31.12.2020 were examined.
Results:
35 cases were included in the study. Thirty-two victim were female and 3 victim were male. The average age of the victims was 15. 94±2,98. The age range of the victims was 11-26 years. Nineteen victims were exposed to nude photos/videos, 15 victims were exposed to sexually explicit conversations. Victims were exposed to online violence via Whatsapp (14), Facebook (7), Instagram (6), Twitter (1) and Snapchat (1). 10 victims were threatened to share nude photos/videos via social media platforms.
Conclusion:
Online sexually explicit conversation and sexually explicit photo/video sharing has emerged as a new type of violence with the increasing use of social media. It is necessary to organize training programs for children and adolescents and their parents about safe internet and social media use, and to raise awareness of the society about online risk factors and precautions to be taken.
Keywords: Social media, sexual violence, online sexual violence
References
1
Borders B. A brief history of social media. 2nd ed. 2009. https://www.scribd.com/document/76840944/A-Brief-History-of-Social-Media-Oleh-Brett-Borders-Upload-by-Abdul-Murad-Abd-Hamid
2
Hesmondhalgh D, editor. The cultural industries. 2nd ed. 2018.
3
Bat ZB, Vural ZB, Mikail BA. Yeni bir iletişim ortami olarak sosyal medya: ege üniversitesi iletişim fakültesine yönelik bir araştirma. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2010;5(20):3348-3382. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.65130
4
Pewresearch. Social Media Fact Sheet. 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
5
Brandtzæg PB, Heim J. Why people use social networking sites. In International conference on online communities and social computing. Springer. 2009;5621:143-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_16
6
Suler J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2004;7(3):321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
7
Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Wolak J. Victimization of youths on the Internet. Journal of Aggression. Maltreatment & Trauma. 2004;8(1-2):1-39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v08n01_01
8
Çevrimiçi Genç Türkiye: Türkiye’deki Dijital Durumla ilgili Araştırma Çalışması. UNICEF. Türkiye;2011.
9
Barron M, Kimmel M. Sexual violence in three pornographic media: Toward a sociological explanation. Journal of Sex Research. 2000;37(2):161-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552033
10
Henry N, Powell A. Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2018;19(2):195-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189
11
Hasebrink U, Livingstone S, Haddon L, Olafsson K, editors. Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids Online. 2nd ed. London; 2009. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313011120_Comparing_children’s_online_opportunities_and_risks_across_Europe_cross-national_comparisons_for_EU_Kids_Online_2nd_edition
12
O’Keeffe GS, Clarke-Pearson K; Council on Communications and Media. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics. 2011;127(4):800-804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054
13
Benotsch EG, Martin AM, Snipes DJ, Bull SS. Significant and non-significant associations between technology use and sexual risk: a need for more empirical attention. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53(1):147-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.028
14
Levine D. Sexting: a terrifying health risk … or the new normal for young adults? J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(3):257-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.003
15
Henry N, Powell A. Sexual violence in the digital age: The scope and limits of criminal law. Social & legal studies. 2016;25(4):397-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663915624273
16
Doğan BÖ, Ertürk YD, Aslan P. Facebook kullanıcısı kız çocuklarına yönelen zorbalık odaklı siber tacizin Cinsel Tacize Dönüşümü: Gazete Haberleri Üzerinden Betimsel Bir Değerlendirme. Etkileşim. 2018;(2):36-55. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2018.2.27
17
Nguyen TT, Nguyen QV, Nguyen DT, Nguyen DT, Huynh-The T, Nahavandi S, et al. Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 2022;223:103525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103525
18
Dodge A, Johnstone E. Using Fake Video Technology To Perpetuate Intimate Partner Abuse. Without My Consent. 2018;1-9.
19
Gámez-Guadix M, Almendros C, Borrajo E, Calvete E. Prevalence and association of sexting and online sexual victimization among Spanish adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2015;12(2):145-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0186-9
20
Drouin M, Tobin E. Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;31:412-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001
21
Mascheroni G, Vincent J, Jimenez E. “Girls are addicted to likes so they post semi-naked selfies”: Peer mediation, normativity and the construction of identity online. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 2015;9(1):5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-5
22
Drouin M, Ross J, Tobin E. Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression?. Computers in human behavior. 2015;50:197-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.001
23
Craven S, Brown S, Gilchrist E. Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations. Journal of sexual aggression. 2006;12(3):287-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600601069414
24
McAlinden AM. ‘Setting’Em Up’: Personal, familial and institutional grooming in the sexual abuse of children. Social & Legal Studies. 2006;15(3):339-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663906066613
25
Smahel D, Machackova H, Mascheroni G, Dedkova L, Staksrud E, Ólafsson K, et al. EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
26
Pewresearch. Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
27
Wolak J, Finkelhor D, Mitchell K. Internet-initiated sex crimes against minors: implications for prevention based on findings from a national study. J Adolesc Health. 2004;35(5):424.e11-454-e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.05.006
28
Marret MJ, Choo WY. Victimization After Meeting With Online Acquaintances: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Adolescents in Malaysia. J Interpers Violence. 2018;33(15):2352-2378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515625502
29
THORN. Responding to Online Threats: Minors’ Perspectives on Disclosing, Reporting, and Blocking. Findings from 2020 quantitative research among 9–17 year olds. https://info.thorn.org/hubfs/Research/Responding%20to%20Online%20Threats_2021-Full-Report.pdf
30
MacPherson S, Brown EC, Herold B, Narayan A. Media-Facilitated Sexual Assault in Children and Teens. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018;57(11):1349-1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922818775744
31
Snaychuk LA, O’Neill ML. Technology-facilitated sexual violence: Prevalence, risk, and resiliency in undergraduate students. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma. 2020;29(8):984-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2019.1710636
32
Rowse J, Bolt C, Gaya S. Swipe right: the emergence of dating-app facilitated sexual assault. A descriptive retrospective audit of forensic examination caseload in an Australian metropolitan service. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2020;16(1):71-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-019-00201-7
33
Zagloul NM, Farghaly RM, ELKhatib H, Issa SY, El-Zoghby SM. Technology facilitated sexual violence: a comparative study between working and non-working females in Egypt before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Egyptian journal of forensic sciences. 2022;12(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-022-00278-2
34
Powell A, Henry N. Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2019;34(17):3637-3665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516672055
35
Erikson EH. Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. International Universities Press. 1968. https://www.worldcat.org/title/identity-and-the-life-cycle-selected-papers/oclc/248476
36
Sengupta A, Chaudhuri A. Are social networking sites a source of online harassment for teens? Evidence from survey data. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011;33(2):284-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.09.011
37
Coyle CL, Vaughn H. Social networking: Communication revolution or evolution?. Bell Labs Technical Journal. 2008;13(2):13-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bltj.20298
38
The National Archives. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_310435.pdf
39
Helweg‐Larsen K, Schütt N, Larsen HB. Predictors and protective factors for adolescent Internet victimization: Results from a 2008 nationwide Danish youth survey. Acta Paediatrica. 2012;101(5):533-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02587.x
40
Rowse J, Mullane S, Bassed R, Tully J. Technology‐facilitated sexual assault in children and adolescents; is there a cause for concern? Fourteen years of experience at a metropolitan forensic paediatric medical service. J Paediatr Child Health. 2022;58(3):409-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15724
41
Sourander A, Klomek AB, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, Koskelainen M, et al. Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(7):720-728. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79
42
Butler AC. Child sexual assault: Risk factors for girls. Child Abuse Negl. 2013;37(9):643-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.06.009
43
Salerno-Ferraro AC, Erentzen C, Schuller RA. Young women’s experiences with technology-facilitated sexual violence from male strangers. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(19-20):NP17860-NP17885. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211030018
44
Shannon D. Online sexual grooming in Sweden—Online and offline sex offences against children as described in Swedish police data. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention. 2008;9(2):160-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043850802450120
45
Cripps J. Forms of technology-facilitated sexual violence and university women’s psychological functioning [master’s thesis]. Canada: University of Toronto; 2016. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/74589/3/Cripps_Jenna_201611_MA_thesis.pdf
46
Helweg Larsen K, Larsen HB. The prevalence of unwanted and unlawful sexual experiences reported by Danish adolescents: Results from a national youth survey in 2002. Acta Paediatrica. 2006;95(10):1270-1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/08035250600589033
