Bias in Scientific Research
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Invited Author-Review
    P: 194-206
    August 2023

    Bias in Scientific Research

    The Bulletin of Legal Medicine 2023;28(2):194-206
    1. Mersin İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü, Mersin, Türkiye
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 22.05.2023
    Accepted Date: 01.06.2023
    Publish Date: 01.08.2023
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    The aim of research is to find the “truth” in medicine. The researcher should be aware of the causes and characteristics of conscious and unconscious errors and know how to prevent them in order to reflect the “truth”. The value determined in epidemiological studies is the sum of: 1) Truth, 2) Random error, 3) Systematic error (Bias). In order to declare that the result is correct, errors must be excluded. Errors may arise at several stages in epidemiological research. Systematic errors lead to bias. In controlled studies, systematic errors often cause significant difference of one study group. However, “random error” or the chance factor does not cause bias. Since this type of error causes a deviation in both groups in the same direction, its effect is canceled, however the sensitivity of the results may decrease. Bias may be conscious or unconscious. A conscious bias is an intentional unethical act, made in order to achieve an intended result, ignoring scientific rules. Unconscious bias is due to inexperience of the researchers who do not consider the factors that may affect the results. Various errors may be made during epidemiological measurements. Since errors can never be eliminated, one should aim to minimize errors. Minimizing systematic errors increases the validity, and minimizing random errors increases power and accuracy of the studies. Bias results in incorrect diagnosis and management proposals, and waste of resources in studies that are carried out to diagnose health problems and to develop management strategies.

    Keywords: Epidemiology, scientific research, bias, systematic error

    References

    1
    Aksakoğlu G. Sağlıkta Araştırma ve Çözümleme, İzmir 2006
    2
    Çakır B, Sağlık Araştırmalarında Bias (Yanlılık, Taraf Tutma): Tipleri, Sınıflandırılması, Nedenleri, Önleme Yöntemleri 1-2, Türkiye Klinikleri, J Med Sci. 2005;25:100-110.
    3
    Turaman C. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Araştırmacının Epidemiyoloji El Kitabı, Somgür Yayıncılık, Ankara
    4
    Alkan H. Bilimsel Yayınlarda Taraf Tutma, Sağlık Bilimlerinde Süreli Yayıncılık. 2008:89-95. https://docplayer.biz.tr/82047-Bilimsel-yayinlarda-taraf-tutma-hamdi-akan.html
    5
    Rosenstock L, Lee LJ. Attacks on science: the risks to evidence-based policy. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(1):14-18. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.1.14
    6
    Gülesen Ö. Çağdaş Epidemiyoloji. Bursa. 1995.
    7
    Hayran O. Sağlıkla İlgili Araştırmalarda Karşılaşılan Önemli Hatalar. 2. Ulusal Çevre Hekimliği Kongresi Kitabı Sf: 319-323; 2006
    8
    Akdur R. Halk Sağlığı. Ankara. 1998. https://www.recepakdur.com/media/1275/04-akdur-r-ve-ark-halk-sag-lig-i-antip-1998.pdf
    9
    Akgül A. Tıbbi Araştırmalarda İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri- SPSS Uygulamaları, Ankara. 2003.
    10
    Dunn KM, Jordan K, Lacey RJ, Shapley M, Jinks C. Patterns of consent in epidemiologic research: evidence from over 25,000 responders. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(11):1087-1094. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh141
    11
    Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet. 2002;359(9302):248-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07451-2
    12
    Tezcan S. Epidemiyoloji. Tıbbi Araştırmaların Yöntem Bilimi, Ankara; Halk Sağlığı Vakfı Yayını Yayın. 1992;92(2).
    13
    Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Kjellström T. Temel Epidemiyoloji, DSÖ: Cenevre. Nobel & Güneş Tıp Kitabevi. 1997. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/36838/9241544465_tur.pdf?sequence=7
    14
    Greenberg R.S., Medical Epidemiology. A Lange Medical Book.
    15
    Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V, Biyoistatistik, Ankara 2002
    16
    Sorias S. Psikiyatri Araştırmalarında Sık Görülen Yöntem Hataları. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 1997;8(4):241–248. http://psikiyatridizini.net/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=2605
    17
    Bertan M, Güler Ç. Halk Sağlığı Temel Bilgiler. Ankara. 1995
    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House